PC Gaming

10 readers

1 users here now

Discuss Games, Hardware and News on PC Gaming **Discord** https://discord.gg/4bxJgkY **Mastodon** https://cupoftea.social **Donate** https://ko-fi.com/cupofteasocial **Wiki** https://www.pcgamingwiki.com

founded 1 year ago

Playing Cyberpunk 2077 on a Radeon GPU? Don't use FSR, try XeSS instead (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 year ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/PCGaming@kbin.social

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Looking to dust off Cyberpunk 2077 for the new 2.0 update? If you want the game looking, and running, like Johnny Silverhand's Porsche 911 Turbo, you should enable one of the game's many available upscaling technologies. You have a few to choose from: DLSS, FSR, and XeSS.

You can take your pick of the lot with a modern GeForce graphics card installed in your PC, though I would stick with Nvidia's own DLSS. Cyberpunk 2077 has become the poster child for new DLSS versions, including DLSS 3.5 with Ray Reconstruction, and it looks real good. But those with AMD or Intel cards, or older Nvidia GPUs, don't have that option available to them.

(OP: Article has some comparison shots with sliders)

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] xNIBx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didnt read the article but the benchmark numbers indicate that it is unfair to compare the settings based on their terminology. XeSS Balanced performs(as in fps) equally to FSR Quality. So no wonder when you compare XeSS Balanced with FSR Balanced, the XeSS will look better.

The reviewer should have normalized the comparisons for similar fps, not for whatever word term the option uses.

[–] geosoco@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The article wasn't really about benchmarking, but rather just that XeSS will likely just look better than FSR and that you can still run XeSS on AMD cards.