this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

4836 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rishi Sunak has sparked fury among environmentalists, business, international allies and many of his own MPs by watering down key climate change commitments aimed at reaching net zero by 2050.

The prime minister held a panicked called with cabinet ministers before announcing that the 2030 ban on the sale of petrol and diesel cars will be pushed back until 2035 at a Downing Street press conference.

Mr Sunak said it “cannot be right to impose such significant costs on working people” and insisted there had been no “meaningful democratic debate” on how Britain reaches net zero.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mateoto@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Climate change policies often disproportionately affect the working class, who struggle to afford green investments.

It's frustrating that the Tories, instead of subsidizing electric vehicles to help working-class folks, seem more interested in favoring the oil industry by extending petrol car sales. Rishi Sunak and his party need to prioritize people over profits.

In other words: Sunak and the Tories are wankers.

[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

there had been no “meaningful democratic debate” on how Britain reaches net zero.

Then do that

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Or maybe acknowledge that it actually did happen and that was what lead to the 2030 deadline.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mr Sunak said it “cannot be right to impose such significant costs on working people”

Right now if you drive into a number of cities in the UK you'll be charged for the privilege. UNLESS, you own a new car, in which case you're magically exempt from such a clause.

We already have "poor taxes" on travel and petrol prices are untenable for people on a"living" wage.

Standing with one foot in and one foot out of this debate is an extremely weak stance to take.

[–] HanDman@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

He’s getting a brown envelope and pretending ULEZ has made people angry enough to vote for them. It’s got nothing to do with the country’s best interests.