this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
67 points (95.9% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
378 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why does the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada refuse to get a security clearance to see classified documents. He is the first to scream about being left out, but this is entirely up to him. I suspect there is something that would prevent him from getting a security clearance and he does not want us to know. Or perhaps he is under the control of a foreign power..... #Canada #SquintyMcProudBoy

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] undercrust@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 year ago

Its a purposeful choice. This way PP gets to scream about government secrets to his sycophants. If he went and did the right thing, he would both be properly informed and unable to constantly spew conspiracies.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He should already have a security clearance working in government. Not being able to get one or not being willing to get one should disqualify you from office.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He should already have a security clearance working in government.

He almost certainly has a security clearance (likely "Reliable"), but it probably needs to be upgraded (probably "Top Secret", maybe just "Secret"). Security clearances are pursued based on what's necessary, not what a person is "eligible" for.

EDIT: Added security classifications.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Because, as Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet puts it, it’s a β€œdumb trap.”

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Just a hunch, but I'd imagine that one of the conditions of getting a security clearance is "don't tell anyone what we're about to show you" and he won't promise not to expose anything that makes the liberals look bad.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well if we're speculating, I'd guess plausible deniability. Knowledge is power.

For example, say there's something in the docs he already knows about (in broad strokes) but he needs an excuse for not being prepared to handle it once he's in office (i.e. anything with negative outcomes that can only be averted with direct public sector spending), OR he has a source willing to leak documents to him and wants plausible deniability so that when something that he feels he could spin his party's way gets leaked to media to manipulate opinions, it won't be traced back to him.

EDIT I want to add that I don't think only the CPC exclusively would do this stuff, but I've heard reports journalists need to be wary of intentional leaks for political gain and I'd be very surprised if the CPC wasn't participating in this kind of thing.