this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
55 points (93.7% liked)

News

23311 readers
3614 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Germany is facing difficulties in taking in more migrants, President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said on Wednesday.

"Germany, like Italy, is at the limit of its capacity," Steinmeier said in an interview with Italian Newspaper Corriere della Sera, pointing out that Germany had received a third of all EU asylum requests in the first half of 2023.

The president acknowledged that both Italy and Germany had "heavy loads to bear" and called for a "fair distribution" of migratory burdens within Europe.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It is apparent that the asylum system is broken. Europe and North America need immigrants, but we need them to arrive in an organized, thoughtful manner that helps migrants integrate, get jobs, find affordable housing, and learn the local language. It takes lots of infrastructure to accommodate millions of extra people, which is why unrestrained migration just doesn't work, for anyone. The problems of mass migration then become a flashpoint for the far right to take advantage of the population's discontent.

[–] Risus_Nex@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But, instead of making legal immigration easy and productive, we pay companies like Frontex, who violate human rights, to keep everyone out. Human trafficking is only a business because we make it next to impossible for refugees to immigrate legally.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Illegal is the wrong adjective for asylum seekers, because the right of asylum explicitly states, that you do not have to do anything before arriving in the EU. There is no way of seeking asylum illegally.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

Refugees which only exist because "first world countries" fouled up their homelands through political and industrial fuckery and made them unliveable.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The migrant conundrum is only going to get worse as more and more places in the world become harder to live in. Climate change disasters bankrupt governments, record heatwaves crash worker productivity and raise societal tension, flooding destroys large swathes of previously usable housing, and social unrest follows, along with corruption and political volatility across the board.

And those people have to go somewhere.

Meanwhile, places that actually have resources and haven't been hobbled yet by natural disasters and cultural upheaval - like Germany - just want to turn their backs, as if they don't have anything to do with the problem and therefore have no responsibility for dealing with it.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're conflating asylum with immigration.

[–] Chreutz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Almost all migrants call for asylum, and it's then on the country to process it and evaluate if it is true. In that time, typically the asylum seeker will be able to stay. There is afaik no reason not to request asylum. So the two are very much linked in practice.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Conservatives will never go for that

[–] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe Europe shouldn't have fucked up Africa and the US shouldn't have fucked uo South America. You have to admit that there's a certain karma to the situation, although unfortunately the poor and the migrants, as usual, get the worst of it.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nah I don't have to admit that there is any supernatural karma to the situation. I imagine that is you trying to rationalize a world that shows all evidence to be indifferent to human suffering.

Bad things happen to good people, bad people, and everyone in-between. Good things operate the same way. By acknowledging this we can be kind to people suffering because we know that it is at its core an unjust existence.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Asylum seekers are not migrants. Migrants can be turned away with no moral fault. Asylum seekers, on the other hand, seek asylum from danger. Turning them away means leaving them exposed to that danger. If we do so, while we're doing more than fine financially, then that is a violation of basic morals and human decency.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I agree with you, we also must recognize that there are limits to what can be done to help asylum seekers without breaking things and no longer being able to help anyone.

True, its really catch 22

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

True but what metrics are being used to determine this?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An asylum seeker should be equally happy about having a safe harbor in Germany or Portugal. They don't all need to go to the same country.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I did not argue against that. I am absolutely in favor of discussing which countries should chip in how much.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

** Looks towards Eastern Europe.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Here we go again. Fortunate Son blasts in the background