this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
43 points (97.8% liked)

Quark's

1092 readers
2 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Basically Disney is keeping a lot of the same creatives behind the original Daredevil, but intend to use season 1 pay rates because they tacked, 'Born Again' on to the title.

Pretty gross penny pinching from one of the wealthiest media corporations in the world.

[–] dylanmorgan 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, look at any of the Disney channel series, they all change the name slightly to reset the season and avoid union required pay increases. One example: The Suite Life… which was split into 2-3 season series.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hollywood accounting strikes again!

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It is a complete reboot though isn’t it? The original show on Netflix isn’t part of the canon of this one? If so then I don’t really get their complaint.

Even if they wipe the continuity, which is still very unclear, is it really fair to call it a "complete reboot" when they're using the same cast for the most prominent roles?

[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A tonne of the same cast are returning. Bernthal is still the Punisher, D'Onofrio is still Kingpin... no, this is a calculated decision to pay the workers less.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Same actors != not a reboot. Iirc they’re going to have gal gadot as Wonder Woman again but are rebooting her character so the 2 previous movies are not canon, didn’t happen.

If they’re making a new series that has literally nothing to do with the previous one, zero connection to anything that happened in it, how is it not a reboot? Should they use different actors just to justify it being a reboot?

[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I am fully in agreement with you, although I can see why you and others didn't take that from my initial comment. The calculated decision I referred to was Disney's cynical claim that this is a reboot. They're shafting workers, we can all see it.