this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
187 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2871 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

epicenter

I do not think it means what you think it means.

[–] tocano@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Epicentre - (formal) the central point of something

edit: spelling

[–] fubo@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The epicenter is not the center; it's a point above the center. It's from seismology. An earthquake's origin is beneath the earth's surface. The epicenter is the point on the surface that's directly above the origin point.

[–] tocano@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, it is used like that. However, not just in english, but in many languages, epicentre is sometimes used with the meaning of "centre of something".

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People in here seem to question why it's not the North, being responsible for the vast majority of emissions.

Rich countries have factories and cars, but also a technological standard and environmental regulations. Both limit the amount of air pollution (think dust particles) while greenhouse gases (like CO~2~) are something else.

Now think of a poor country with low regulations and old technology. People in slums burn literal dirt in their ovens. While they contribute almost nothing to climate change, air quality reflects the quality of fuels, ovens, engines and regulations. It's poor.

This is just a general take. I opened the article, but immediately closed it due to popups and eyesore.

[–] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You see it with everything from food quality, cigarettes, fuel. The standards set in the West prevent so much random shit we never acknowledge.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the global south? I'm looking at a map and it seems that the global north is the epicenter of poor air quality.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From the article, they are mentioning the Northern countries of India and Bangladesh and the equatorial country of the Congo (DRC)

I expected a bit more Argentina, South Africa and Australia if we're gonna be talking about the south.

But I guess they mean the third world countries, but that headline has been repeated too much already. And someone harked back to the cold war period and discovered global south used to be a synonym for the third world. (Because the third world had a lower average latitude than the first and second world).

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_North_and_Global_South

It's a socio-economic term rather than a directional term, it's similar to "developing country" and is meant to be an alternative to "third world."

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 3 points 1 year ago

And it’s absolutely fucking stupid.

[–] stepan@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still don't understand why not USA / Canada, where cars are very common

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Non-CO2 pollutants are side products of combustion. A cleaner combustion reduces their amount. Cleaner combustion occurs in healthy, well engineered engines with the help of clean catalytic converters. It means that new and expansive cars are less pollutant.

That's why. Usa and Canada have better cars

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what happens when you continue to burn coal to help lift people from poverty. There has to be a better way.

[–] query@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There is, but coal is cheap, when you only look at what it costs before you set it on fire.