this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
2006 points (98.4% liked)

Memes

45520 readers
1858 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 149 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Salaries should by law be capped at max 10 times the lowest

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago

Careful, you might be starting to make too much sense!

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't Japan have a system like that? The difference in the lowest and highest paid employee can only be so many thousands different?

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep, my friend works in a Japanese company and his CEO only makes 3x his salary.

[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s unfortunate that it also requires you to live within shooting range of North Korea and China. Because Japan is a nice vacation spot.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget appallingly long working hours.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh, and don't be not Japanese

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PR3CiSiON@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then they'd just get two jobs at the same company, and get two salaries or some other loophole the lawmakers planned for the whole time.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Preferable to 319 jobs I'd say.

You people see the fuckery, shrug your shoulders and say "eh - just let them get away with it".

Fuck that, and fuck them - don't be conned into emptying your pockets to spare them the trouble of robbing you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It probably will bankrupt him. But only because he built his business on the basis of exploiting employees. He won't make money if he doesn't do that. Which of course means he shouldn't be in business.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He is only CEO. Ford going to zero will only sting, it cannot bankrupt him.

Your point remains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jpablo68@mujico.org 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's always one of the two with this companies, it's either "we're making millions" or "we're going under" there's no inbetween.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Often both at the same time!

[–] TheMagicalTimonini@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

"Great job team! We've increased our profits more than ever before! Now we need your help more than ever to increase profits even further. Unfortunately we cannot afford to pay our employees more, because of the great investmemts we need to make to keep increasing our profits!"

[–] sdoorex 16 points 1 year ago

The beauty of Hollywood accounting spreading to other industries. Ford Motor Company sells their cars for an on book loss after sales incentives like sub-prime financing through Ford Credit. Ford Credit then makes a profit due to interest payments thus wiping out the loss on the vehicle sale.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 72 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Looks like we found one job that should be automated by AI to save Ford 21 million dollars a year.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you make $100,000 for 40 years straight that is $4M. This dude made $21M in a single year. Ford’s share buyback program in 2022 totaled $484M. GM’a share buyback program totaled $3.4B in the past twelve months. We live in a fucked up world. Meanwhile, Ford/GM/Stellantis employees cannot afford to even buy the vehicles they make or feed themselves decent food.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

CEOs need to take pay cuts. They earn too much and don't provide enough value for their pay.

[–] quatschkopf34@feddit.de 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For context, this research paper was also pre-pandemic.

On average, CEO salaries jumped about 30% since this research was released. Here is an updated article by the EPI EPI Research

Also for context - on 1965, average CEO-to-worker salary ratio was 20:1, and in 1985 it was 59:1.

Not it's almost 400:1.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbowgrease@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks like while all of Chris's brothers got in to comedy his cousin Jim decided to become a laughing stock of a person instead. You did it all wrong, Jimbo.

[–] teft@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Maybe he never watched Tommy Boy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Just broke my brain a little bit, that crazy!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NightLily@lemmy.basedcount.com 34 points 1 year ago

Well yeah? If his workers make 66k how is he going to make 23 mil this year?

Read "Bullshit Jobs" by David Graeber guys. It's really worth it!

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this Guy related to Chris Farley? I definitely see some resemblance.

[–] Glimpythegoblin@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Holy schnikies!

[–] Lemmywhat@monyet.cc 29 points 1 year ago

Total revolution needed. Workers that do the real thing barely can feed their mouth, while those useless management ceo got huge cut

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hope the cost of living helps offset that.. what company has been stealing your labor from you?

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Big Lots, worst pay to effort ratio of anywhere I've ever worked. Working harder than I ever have for less than I ever have until I find something else.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

That sucks smelly ass, sorry to hear that, maybe try and organize once you have another job lined up? I'll never forget working the morning shift at hardes, literally the most stressful job I have ever had, for the least pay I have ever made. I got a job at a factory and made twice the salary, but did a quarter of the work, and I had to hear the people I work with denigrate fastfood workers wanting to raise the minimum wage to $10 an hour, cause they thought they worked so much harder and only made $12 an hour. They pit us against eachother while eating caviar from fishes that are going extinct because they are actively poisoning every aspect of our society and our world simultaneously and living in opulence that make the Kings of old look modest. Shits gotta give...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] andy_wijaya_med@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

No one should earn that kind of money period.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

Why are these posts specifically aimed at car company CEOs?

Are they begging for money in Congress again ?

Is this an anticar thing ?

Are they in union négociations ?

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

The American autoworkers union is currently striking due to stalled contract negotiations.

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To add this for posterity, there is an additional component to the U.S. autoworkers union striking. In 2008 during the global financial crisis (with things like robosigning foreclosures, predatory loans with ballooning interest rates, etc.), some U.S. automakers were asking for government bailouts, which eventually were granted. These bailouts were entirely taxpayer funded. Now the automakers are refusing to meet union contract negotiations. Automakers not paying employees cost-of-living, or frankly, just salary increases is upsetting, but the additional hypocrisy of U.S. tax-paying citizens bailing out these companies with their own money in 2008, and then not having the companies return some of the wealth in 2023 is enraging.

Edit:

Forgot to add that when the automakers were begging for government bailouts, the automakers had to take away worker pensions and some benefits to "protect the system". In 2023, the U.S. autoworkers union is fighting to get those benefits back for the workers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] admin@lemmy.mohammadodeh.com 17 points 1 year ago

How could you be so heartless? How is he supposed to afford his second super yacht?

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Ford has 186,000 employees. His entire salary, divided amongst every employee, would be $112.90.

He's certainly overpaid - like pretty much all CEOs - but this is a bad example.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Its called juxtaposition my guy, Ford also spent almost half billion on stock buybacks last year which could have been used to give every Ford Employee a $2500 bonus to share their profits, but instead they used it to buy back stocks...

[–] dirtbiker509@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago

And buying back the stock has the effect of making the stock price go up. And guess who gets the most stock? The CEO and C suite. They give themselves huge raises by doing this and it's perfectly legal :(

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sure, but Ford made a profit of 10 billion last year according to google. That means that they can give every single one of those 186k people a 6000$ raise and still be left with almost 9 billion in profit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Companies should just do a rotational CEO from their pool of workers and give the position a nice 20% salary bump for the term of the position.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›