this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
45 points (97.9% liked)

Academia

755 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Guitarist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Publish or perish.

[–] Fourth@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Pretty wild to consider how it is. Serious implications.

[–] Pandalus@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Considering that this was written almost 10 years ago, it will only have gotten worse.

We can point this out and complain, but really I fail to see a solution unless there is a systematic change. For that to happen though, those at the top will have to give up on their acquired benefits, so I think it unlikely.

Maybe if grants would be handed out on a 'lottery' basis (grant applications should still be screened to prevent handing out to non-serious applications), this could be achieved?