Oh look, not a drag queen... again...
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
149 points (96.3% liked)
THE POLICE PROBLEM
2478 readers
156 users here now
The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.
99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.
When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.
When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."
When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.
Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.
The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.
All this is a path to a police state.
In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.
Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.
That's the solution.
♦ ♦ ♦
Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.
② If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.
③ Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.
④ Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.
♦ ♦ ♦
ALLIES
• r/ACAB
♦ ♦ ♦
INFO
• A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions
• Cops aren't supposed to be smart
• Killings by law enforcement in Canada
• Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom
• Killings by law enforcement in the United States
• Know your rights: Filming the police
• Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)
• Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.
• Police lie under oath, a lot
• Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak
• Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street
• Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States
• When the police knock on your door
♦ ♦ ♦
ORGANIZATIONS
• NAACP
• National Police Accountability Project
• Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Those drag queens keep not doing terrible things. It's like an un-crime wave!
I am curious when they knew about the 2014 allegations. I dislike waiting 10 years to charge someone.
My bet is he had some type of proof on the phone when they looked for evidence on the other charges
That’s a fair point.
My concern is they did nothing until the child porn came to light and then they added it.
I wonder if maybe the photos invalidated a previously solid alibi?
No clue but I’m intrigued. This is could he a solid example of the police problem.
It’s like they knew about it and did nothing.
And what they should do is throw him right in federal pound you in the ass prison. The fact that you get fired after that should be absolutely secondary to the main issue.
He has to be convicted first.
Most likely it’s a state crime he’s being charged with. State prisons are much worse than federal Prisons.
I don’t want prisons to be shitholes but they are and if convicted he’ll learn why we need reform in our prison sentence.
Rule 1 reminder: Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.
Specifically, prison rape is a human rights problem, not a joke.
I mean, I understand where you're coming from and you can sanction or down vote me for this but when it comes to pedophiles I don't really feel like any decorum is warranted, and in my not so humble opinion that goes double for pedophile police officers.
I will be much more cautious about that in the future though
Remember, not everyone who is accused IS guilty. A fifteen year old kid can be charged with producing child pornography for sending Richard Pics to someone, or even just TAKING them.
And somewhere there is probably a priest who never touched a kid but was accused. Maybe.
That last bit cracked me up. :)
No worries, and thanks. :)
Crazy how often these guys look exactly like stereotype child molesters, from the weak chin/features to the glasses
Child Sexual Abuse Material or CSAM is the correct term for it.