this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
103 points (94.8% liked)

Steam Deck

6009 readers
3 users here now

Universal community link
!steamdeck@lemmy.ml

Rules

Order

Models

64GB eMMC LCD
256GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe OLED
1TB NVMe OLED

Allowed languages

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

ReactOS remains my biggest "But why?" tech story for the past ~20 years.

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Linux doesn't work for most people, and Windows and Mac are corporate. I hope ReactOS succeeds.

[–] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean I wish them the best, but they've been chasing Windows for decades, at what point exactly is this "success" to be measured?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

When they're successful, it will be a good day. For now, it's all about having fun with the journey.

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Surely contributing to Wine and running their windows apps on Linux would yield better faster results than re-implement Windows from scratch. I don't quite see who the target audience is

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If it does, a corporation will buy and use it

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's FOSS. I'd imagine people would fork it, because fuck it

[–] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, they won't.

The value in Windows is no longer Windows. The cost of Windows license to a business is trivial. It's all the associated services. Office, teams, SharePoint, active directory, Outlook. And the ecosystems and support that exist for them all.

Any realistic business that tries to be competitive by not paying for Windows licenses and instead buying this, is utterly delusional.

[–] swab148@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

I agree with you, an open-source OS that could run anything Windows-related would probably be preferable for the average user over switching to something completely new and hoping you can find a workaround or compatibility layer, simply because it's a lot more work. If ReactOS had been around and on par with Linux 20 years ago (oh gosh I'm that old...), I probably would've gone with that on the old PowerBook my grandma gave me rather than Ubuntu, just because I'd been using Windows. At the time, installing Ubuntu was, while the easiest way to get Linux, still not very easy, and I did bork the first hard drive. That said, I don't regret my decision, and I probably wouldn't ever go back to Windows, but I might still give ReactOS a try!

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I hate these types of reactions.

The answer to that dead ass question is always "why not?"

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's a lot of WinXP software out there that people bought licenses for and still want to use.

[–] whatupwiththat@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The BEST Need for Speed EVER!!!

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Shift works fine on modern windows and proton what are you talking about.

[–] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nothing worng with running XP in a VM or network isolated machine. Stability will be more important to these people than anything.

[–] nicman24@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

embedded probably

[–] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 10 points 1 year ago

It's nice to see that ReactOS continues their slow but steady progress.
I've actually more than once helped test versions of ReactOS for research IT at the university where I work, since for some reason even modern equipment sometimes comes with Windows XP -era software - alongside requirements for network access.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


As part of the effort for enabling UEFI support with ReactOS, an open-source operating system re-implementing binary compatibility with Microsoft Windows, a development build of ReactOS is up and running on Valve's Steam Deck handheld game console.

While not suitable for any serious gaming yet with the binary compatibility of ReactOS for modern Windows games still being rather limited especially among Windows device driver support, in early experimental form this open-source OS is up and running on the Steam Deck!

For months there has been work on UEFI support for ReactOS that can be tracked via this pull request.

The ReactOS crew shared that with the work-in-progress code one of the developers is able to run ReactOS on the AMD-powered Steam Deck: Behind the scenes, @The_DarkFire__ has been working on bringing UEFI support to #ReactOS!And here's a surprise by him: With a PR, ReactOS running in Steam Deck!!

!Work in progress.For more information, see here: https://t.co/woLpr8PY6U pic.twitter.com/1DKQKJUXG2— ReactOS (@reactos) September 13, 2023 While it may not be entirely practical at this stage given the limited device driver and modern game binary compatibility with ReactOS, it's an interesting milestone nevertheless for this open-source project.


The original article contains 192 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved -1%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

you had one job

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

TLDR it’s still 32bit, check back next year

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For any practical purposes or just to see if it was possible?

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Likely if possible. ReactOS is still fundamentally alpha software

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Isn't it still stuck in 32bit land?