this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
291 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
4067 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google gets its way, bakes a user-tracking ad platform directly into Chrome::Chrome now directly tracks users, generates a "topic" list it shares with advertisers.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well that explains why I'm seeing full page popups saying I need to disable my adblocker on certain sites..

Okay.. I've resisted long enough. I'll make the switch to Firefox tonight

[–] TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Make sure to use uBlock origin once you switch.

[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks using it now.for chrome. I'll be sure to add it in. Between it and the pihole I should be good.

Thanks for the heads-up

[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Yup. Gang gang

[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I switched a while back for the same reason, in a completely different scenario. Google is playing themselves.

[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I only use chrome for a couple of extensions that aren't available for firefox. I should probably reach out to those companies and request that they get a firefox extension working.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox is working to bring chrome extensions to FF.

[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

That's good to know. I'm surprised that the 2 I currently have to use chrome for aren't already on FF. As I said, I should probably send them an email and ask them to launch one for FF.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what kind of addon would just work in Chrome (not have an alternative in Firefox)?

[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not an addon, it's extensions for services like klarna and zip that let you pay for things over time. Those 2 for example have apps that I can and do use but if I want to use them to pay for say concert tickets it's easier to have it all on my big screen so I can look at whats available and then copy and paste the number into the checkout.

It's not life or death and I can live without it. It is however the only reason I use chrome on my desktop these days.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe you can checkout Waterfox, a fork of Firefox. I haven't tried it myself, but apparently they implemented support for extensions from the Chrome and Opera stores. If you have issues getting the install button to appear, I saw a comment saying they had to reduce tracking protection on the Chrome store to get the button to appear.

https://www.ghacks.net/2021/02/03/waterfox-g3-1-0-introduces-support-for-installing-chrome-and-opera-extensions/?amp=

[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

Like I said, it's not that big of a deal and I can live without it.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger should be the first addons you install.

Also consider the Multi-Account Containers addon. It loads certain domains in their own tabs and isolates them from others.

This is just the basics, there's a deep rabbit hole for privacy of you're interested and lots of interesting extensions for maximum control (cookie auto-deleters, Matrix, JavaScript disablers, anti-fingerprinting, scrubbers etc.) Firefox itself comes with a lot of privacy-related stuff built-in nowadays.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jumped a month ago or so after reading about their "product enhancements" and not being able to install an extension to download a YouTube clip I needed for a work project. Water is excellent, also removing them out of my search as much as possible.

Recommend Degoogle Yourself community for weeding them out wherever you're comfortable. I still have them for photos and maps is better than anything comparable but have given them that much less data to sell. !degoogle@lemmy.ml

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Firefox ftw

[–] ellie 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oof, that's just sad. i hope people switch, firefox is actually not that bad these days

[–] 6xpipe_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Firefox has been very good (better than Chrome) for several years. Ever since they released Quantum.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Unlike the glitzy front-page Google blog post that the redesign got, the big ad platform launch announcement is tucked away on the privacysandbox.com page.

The blog post says the ad platform is hitting "general availability" today, meaning it has rolled out to most Chrome users.

This has been a long time coming, with the APIs rolling out about a month ago and a million incremental steps in the beta and dev builds, but now the deed is finally done.

Users should see a pop-up when they start up Chrome soon, informing them that an "ad privacy" feature has been rolled out to them and enabled.

That's actually what started this whole process: Apple dealt a giant blow to Google's core revenue stream when it blocked third-party cookies in Safari in 2020.

Google says it will block third-party cookies in the second half of 2024—presumably after it makes sure the "Privacy Sandbox" will allow it to keep its profits up.


The original article contains 588 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will this solely be a Chrome "feature" or will it get into Chromium and eventually Edge?

[–] excel@lemmy.megumin.org 6 points 1 year ago

Vivaldi doesn’t (and won’t) have it.

[–] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The article mentioned Apple implementing ad blocking which affected Google's revenue, but I think the author forgot extensions. I had read that adblockers were eating into Google's revenue at an alarming rate.

So first adblocks were compromised (was it Adblock or Adblock Pro that had that whitelisting controversy?). When that didn't work, they took advantage of quicklinking/tracking people through Google AMP links, which also allowed advantages to be given to Facebook ad bidding (Jedi Blue - a "mindtrick" these assholes named it) and getting access to Android and Chrome users information in exchange for not setting up a competing ad service plan/ecosystem. And now we're here, with Google disabling extensions altogether and just straight up tracking you directly in Chrome.

Adblocking really, really screwed them over. On one hand good, on the other fuck Google.

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Part of the issue is that ads are an escalating infection. Anytime a platform tries to implement 'sane' advertising practices (small footprint, no annoying sounds or motion, etc) it inevitably creeps into more and more abusive interactions with users. Just look at how bad YouTube has gotten. Look at how far Google search has fallen. Ads are like crack. You can't just do it a little bit. You get hooked and you keep escalating until you've ruined everything with it.