this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

Україна Ukraine

5 readers
1 users here now

Все про Україну Everything about Ukraine

founded 1 year ago
 

The billlionaire allegedly feared the strike on Crimea could trigger nuclear war.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

The man is an enemy of the west and should be treated as such

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago
[–] brothershamus@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Billionaire dipshit doesn't understand why he can't order everyone to do what he wants. People die.

  1. Nationalize SpaceX now
  2. Tax Billionaires at 90% now
  3. Begin the investigation of Musk's inevitable and obvious tax fraud

This "I just wanted peace (for Putin)" shit is another item too far. Way too far.

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago
[–] coffeetest@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow directly intervening in a foreign war. He's insane.

[–] brothershamus@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

"Narcissistic personality disorder"

[–] brothershamus@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Elon Musk secretly ordered SpaceX engineers to switch off the Starlink satellite communications network near the coast of occupied Crimea in order to thwart a Ukrainian surprise attack on Russia’s naval fleet, according to a report. The incident last year is reported in Walter Isaacson’s upcoming biography of the billionaire titled Elon Musk. With the comms down, the Ukrainian submarine drones packed with explosives “lost connectivity and washed ashore harmlessly,” Isaacson writes, according to CNN. Musk was reportedly motivated to foil the attack out of concern that a strike on Crimea would constitute a “mini-Pearl Harbor” and lead to Russia retaliating with nuclear weapons. The SpaceX boss apparently began to question his decision to support Starlink being used for Kyiv’s military communications when Ukraine started to use the tech in offensive operations against Russia. “How am I in this war?” Musk asked Isaacson. “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

[–] falsem@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

What a turd

[–] ArtieShaw@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I understanding this correctly?

  1. The internet service provider being used by the Ukrainian military not only knew about specific battle plans but they relayed that information to their CEO? (No wait. The article claims that military officials actually called him up and gave him the details personally. This included schematics of the submarine drones which were "impressive." Good freaking lord.)
  2. The CEO then benevolently pulled the plug while having an emotional and heroic moment of introspection regarding the tools of war??

Both of those things sound very made up to me. The first sounds fabricated as a Macguffin to lead into #2. That's where where all the self-aggrandizing and emotional shit happens.

But if anyone thinks the first thing is plausible, I'd be interested in hearing more opinions.

I honestly don't care about the second item, but if the military is relaying plans to this known fuckwit, they probably got what they had coming.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, the idea that Musk had such in depth knowledge of the attack sounds like horseshit to me.

I also somewhat respect the idea of him not being happy his system is being used to directly control a weapon.

[–] AppleAtCha@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Would starlink exist without defense contracts?

[–] Yoscooter@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago