this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
40 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
156 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m unclear from the article: does blasting the battery with sound waves extend the battery’s life threefold, or does it make it last three times longer than a Li-Ion battery of similar power? And is the recycling the sonic blasting, or is the battery also able to be broken down and used to build new batteries?

[–] Akip@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

I think this article does a better job at explaining. https://www.hackster.io/news/a-high-frequency-blast-of-sound-could-push-future-batteries-to-a-nine-year-lifespan-ease-recycling-944c15f50f9f

From what I understand with this new battery, it's both easier to disassemble the lithium part for recycling and additionally the rusting MXene film used can be de-rusted with sound waves. Therefore when performance drops it allows the "electrical and electrochemical performance to be recovered".