Seems like conspiratorial nonsense reasoning. Some videos show obvious flares. Couple of anonymous sources posting on obscure websites or calling into an obscure podcast. Give me a break.
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
4 points (58.3% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1206 readers
1 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Here is an accented e for you to copy into your title: é
This was definitely an interesting case. If anything, it showed how the power of the masses can contribute to documenting (or fabricating) encounters and can also analyze the evidence. I know that there are a lot of people torn on the overall evidence, but it's at least good to see potential cases getting a lot of social engagement.