this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2022
6 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17683 readers
19 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A small success for the Fediverse ? What do you think ?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 6 points 2 years ago

It's still Google so that's a bad sign.

[–] anova@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I genuinely never thought I'd see the day that Google (at least, some facet of it?) would find itself in the fediverse.

I remember reading a few days ago about how some instances were defederating with others who were hosting car companies. I wonder how long it'll take people to do that with tech companies as well. I'm not entirely sure how to feel about it but I definitely don't think I'd want to share an instance with Google. If we were to imagine a world in which Google decided to go all in and set up a bigger social operation on Mastodon.social, how long would it take them to start influencing the instance's politics? What would the ramifications of that be for my instance that federates with Mastodon.social, if any?

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Remember when Google Talk was federated XMPP? Maybe we'll have a second chance.

[–] joeldebruijn@fosstodon.org 3 points 2 years ago

@kevincox @anova
I think brands should set up their own instances to host their respective accounts for general webcare, products, conferences and news etc

Fans can follow according their liking.
I on the other hand can block them according my not - liking.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

It's still Google, but it's a good sign.

[–] mooniyaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Nothing inherently good about this, the Fediverse has only a handful of full time developers, so the network is very vulnerable to Embrace.Extend.Extinguish