this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
29 points (96.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9872 readers
1338 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

.world c/news didn't like this so maybe it fits better here

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Officially 67yo to get full SSI benefits from the US govt now. It's like they purposefully mismanaged the 12% of everything I produced for my entire career.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 18 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It wasn't mismanaged, at all.

It was flat-out stolen by Congress.

Or if you prefer to be all polite they took it, and wrote an IOU knowing full well there's no way there'd ever be any money to pay them back without jacking taxes way up, and that's never going to happen. (And even if it did, that's you paying yourself back with new taxes on your old taxes.)

Functionally the same thing, really.

[–] RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

It was managed, just not for his benefit

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Officially 67yo to get full SSI benefits from the US govt now.

Your statement is factual, but the context sounds like its new info or a change when it isn't. This was set into law in 1983 and the only recent increase for full retirement benefits is a retirement delayed by 2 months as planned for 2025 (again as part of the 1983 legislation).

Were you unaware that this was decided this way 41 years ago?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

They mismanaged having the working class make enough to fund this program properly. But stagnant wages have meant the income to outgoing ratio has dipped to the point where the workers to retirees ratio is endangering the whole program. All while maintaining a cap on how much you need to contribute per year