this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
163 points (97.7% liked)

BrainWorms

1219 readers
48 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mateoto@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's truly surprising how a small minority once held such significant sway over public life, using their influence to gain advantages that seemed almost unchecked. Reflecting on the conservative court in Wisconsin, it's astonishing that for years, some could accept or overlook their practices like gerrymandering and questionable rulings.

But now, there's a fresh breeze of change. With a shift in the court's composition, it's heartening to witness ethics taking center stage, especially after a period of conservative dominance. The fact that this court's legitimacy is anchored in democratic processes and its direction leans towards progressivism signals a positive step towards a more just and balanced future.

It reminds us that even seemingly entrenched power dynamics can evolve, and that the pursuit of ethical governance is paramount.

[–] Pattern@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is all true. I think it’s also important to note that the court’s shift is a result of strong state-level organizing by the WI Democratic Party. Voter mood has shifted since the Tea Party years, yes, but our Democratic Party has also done really well in getting out the vote, particularly in college towns.

What’s happening in Wisconsin is my rejoinder to apathetic or nihilistic voters. Organizing matters and voting matters. There is a real difference between the two main parties and tangible benefits happen when you elect Democrats.

[–] Tester@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rules for thee but not for me...

[–] JesseoftheNorth@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds, but does not protect.” - Frank Wilhoit

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

------ianity can't die soon enough.

[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey there. I think we’re all confused about what your comment is trying to say

[–] istoff@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah; I’ve never seen someone censor that word before…

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My favorite is when the "devout" will type it as "Xianity" to keep from "using the Lord's name in vain" 🤣 Do they not know that it's even closer to looking like "insanity" at that point?! 😱🤣🤘🏼

[–] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Christinsanity