this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
225 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4315 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Jacobin.com

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“How the hell is it that when you’re talking about financial workers or white-collar workers, this is acceptable?” said Fain at a recent strike preparation conference. Noting that many corporate leaders are still working remotely, he added, “It’s okay for them but goddammit, when we ask for the same thing, for some fair treatment and some fucking work-life balance, what do they say to us? They say, ‘You don’t deserve it.’”

I like this guy

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unions seem like the most viable way for us to organize.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

100%. Strong unions make strong businesses.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

As someone who just saw his work week go from 40 hours to 45 hours with no additional pay, I wouldn’t mind this. It’s not as simple as people think, but it’s surely manageable if companies wanted it to work.

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think I would even be less productive if I had to work only 3 or 4 days. I could focus / crunch more because I know that I have more time to rest.

We had this situation during covid where we could only work 3 days a week, and it was kinda nice since nobody was slacking and it was satisfying to just get things done... and then enjoy the long weekends.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Princeofspace@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read the original article to get the basics of the idea. But I also recommend all of his books.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the original

[–] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I've heard on the radio this mentioned as part of the negotiations for the new contract with the auto companies and thought this was a sort of tactic to ask for more so they can settle higher, but I'd love to see this be a sincere goal. Given all the productivity gains over the decades, we should actually be at 3-day work weeks of 24 hours, but 32-hour 4-day work weeks would still be a lot better than the awful situation we're in right now.