this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
-8 points (43.5% liked)

Firefox

17602 readers
419 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why @firefox is not implementing this UI by default and why none of the Firefox-derived web browsers implementing this.

I somehow managed to build this, but its not prefect.

@librewolf

At this point the there has been almost no significant improvement.
How Mozilla Ruined Firefox --> https://youtu.be/ugnOM2mzgNU

Hoping @firefox wont forces me to move to brave.

#Linux #foss #privacy #firefox

EDIT:- New UI with Minimize Close Maximize button, giving space which can be used to drag.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MorphiusFaydal@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I definitely prefer Firefox as it is now to that.

[–] miniu@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

I'll note that not everyone has hundreds of tabs open ;) I prefer my tabs on the top as I never have more then 4 and even then I feel it's too many.

[–] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes please on integrated vertical tabs and tab groups, and not the crappy sidebar.

[–] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@nan
thank god, one like minded person, integrated vertical tabs and tab groups please

[–] gabriele97@lemmy.g97.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yep I don't understand why they have not been implemented yet

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By the way, not sure if you did this intentionally, but through the magic of federation, you also posted this to the Firefox community on Lemmy: https://lemmy.ml/post/3562992

That's why some of the comments are interpreting this post a lot less like you're just expressing a personal opinion, but rather like you're saying this is the one and only truth...

[–] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago

@Ephera I just want to share my thought, and definitely this is not the only solution, this worked for me doesn't mean it will for all.

I am just suggesting this to be one of the possible consideration.

Hi there! Your text contains links to other Lemmy communities, here are correct links for Lemmy users: !librewolf@lemmy.ml

[–] lightsecond@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t look half-bad but i would rather have roughly the same firefox interface on every OS than have it customized for gnome as it appears here.

[–] CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Take a look at Floorp, it's a little rough around the edges but has vertical tabs plus a lot of other nice features. Feels a lot like Vivaldi but Firefox-based instead of Chromium-based.

[–] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's too bad, I just started using it a few days ago and I love it. Covers most of the customization I want to do to Firefox that's kind of a pain like vertical tabs, alternate themes, reopen last closed tab button, etc etc. Out of curiosity, what do you prefer about other browsers/forks? Floorp seems like it covers more of the changes you've made in the screenshot than any other I know of, is there another one with more customization options?

[–] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@CloverSi to be honest, there is no significant improvement or difference between most of the firefox derivative and firefox iteself, they dont bring anything new/different to table other than implement uere.js by default.

which i can just copy past from github.

And the floorps has just copied all the css files from https://github.com/MrOtherGuy/firefox-csshacks/ and implemented it in toggle, which anyone can reproduce and there was some flaws. something like "Arc Browser" or "SigmaOS browser" which are macos only

Your original post was asking why no Firefox forks implement that ui, but now you're saying there's no point when you can make those changes yourself...

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have set up something pretty similar to yours in windows, and people have actually complemented me on it when I share my screen. That being said, I think it would be a pretty intimidating interface for non-power users.

[–] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago

@dantheclamman Yeah i totally forget about non-power user, I am happy with result and want to share.

[–] Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if I unterstand you correctly, but Vivaldi can be configured to have tabs on any side, and (sorta-nested) tab groups if you're so inclined. It's based on Chromium though.

[–] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Radiant_sir_radiant I tried it for a week, I like it but its not @firefox (does it make sense, definitely not)

To be honest its very hard to justify why @firefox "only" , cant see myself using anything other than firefox based and cant reason why this is case.

[–] Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey, "I'm happy with it" is as good a justification as any. 🙂

It does make it a challenge though. I don't know of any Firefox-based browser that does that. But then again, I'm by no means well-informed there. Maybe somebody will build one?

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 1 points 11 months ago

I dont think it should be default. Personally I think tabs on right click might even be smarter since I would not have to move the mouse so far. Yes, I don't horde tabs. I never understood how to handle tabs without the title. So I never have more than 10 tabs.