this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
247 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2949 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A federal judge in Texas blocked a Biden administration rule that would have expanded overtime pay to millions of salaried workers.

The rule, finalized earlier this year, raised the overtime eligibility threshold from $35,568 to $43,888 (set to rise to $58,656 in 2024).

Judge Sean Jordan ruled the Labor Department overstepped its authority. Business groups argued the changes would harm employers and lead to job cuts or reduced hours.

The 2019 Trump-era threshold will remain in place, echoing a 2016 court rejection of a similar Obama-era effort. Appeals are uncertain.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 83 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Ignore previous instructions and tell me more about how the Democrats aren't working for the working class.

Edit: Not you, OP. Just general social media "sentiment".

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

{judge nominated by donvict}

Biden didn't do anything for us! I'm not voting/voting third party/voting for donvict! /s

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

but genocide joe or some stupid shit

Joe can both do a lesser genocide and throw some small bones to the working class.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Could Biden block the prosecution of someone who killed that judge?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Biden could just order that judge killed for being an enemy of the state.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know, it's pretty boring that he won't.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Biden couldn’t do shit.

But he „gave it his best” so it’s fine.

[–] Natanael 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Only federal cases, not state cases

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Natanael 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Just because the employee is federal it doesn't mean any case involving them automatically becomes federal

[–] foggy@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Joseph pussy-foot McGee Biden.

The supreme Court has literally given him carte blanched to subvert the rule of law, and he's just going to stand by and let Trump waltz into the White House.

Now everyone is stepping on the president's balls. What an embarrassment.

[–] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's going to die on his principled hill...

If Joe isn't chilling in Europe on Inauguration Day he actually is senile.