this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
113 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

His attacks have grown more sweeping, with Kennedy suggesting he will clear out "entire departments" at FDA, including the agency's food and nutrition center. The program is responsible for preventing foodborne illness, promoting health and wellness, reducing diet-related chronic disease and ensuring chemicals in food are safe.

If confirmed, Kennedy in principle could overturn almost any FDA decision. There have been rare cases of such decisions in previous administrations. Under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, HHS overruled FDA approval decisions on the availability of emergency contraceptives.

Unwinding FDA regulations or revoking approval of longstanding vaccines and drugs would likely be more challenging. FDA has lengthy requirements for removing medicines from the market, which are based on federal laws passed by Congress. If the process is not followed, drugmakers could bring lawsuits that would need to work their way through the courts.

Kennedy, who has said "there's no vaccine that is safe and effective," would be in charge of appointments to the committee of influential panel experts who help set vaccine recommendations to doctors and the general public. Those include polio and measles given to infants and toddlers to protect against debilitating diseases to inoculations given to older adults to protect against threats like shingles and bacterial pneumonia as well as shots against more exotic dangers for international travelers or laboratory workers.

— "We need to act fast," Kennedy was reported to have said during an a Scottsdale, Arizona event over the weekend. "So that on Jan. 21, 600 people are going to walk into offices at NIH and 600 people are going to leave." [...] Kennedy wants half of the NIH budget to go toward "preventive, alternative and holistic approaches to health," he wrote in the Wall Street Journal in September. "In the current system, researchers don't have enough incentive to study generic drugs and root-cause therapies that look at things like diet."

Kennedy has not focused as much on the agency that spends more than $1.5 trillion yearly to provide health care coverage for more than half of the country through Medicaid, Medicare or the Affordable Care Act. [...] Instead, he's been an outspoken opponent of Medicare or Medicaid covering expensive weight-loss drugs, like Ozempic or Zepbound. Those drugs are not widely covered by either program, but there's some bipartisan support in Congress to change that.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure the man who orchestrated a deadly measles outbreak in Samoa will do a fine job with our public health policy.

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Feel like some states should coalition together and organize their own agencies

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That isn't a bad idea. If they truly plan to gut the federal government and reduce its income, this will have an outsized effect on funds available for the red shithole states. Let the blue states band together to provide for their citizens while those who wanted this can wallow in their own shit.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Wow, that's a disgusting take. Not everybody in red states wanted it and not everyone can afford to move to a blue state or they might be penalised for visiting one for health care.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't create the reality they're facing, and it's happening regardless. No reason everyone has to suffer too. Sucks to suck.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 3 points 3 hours ago

That's a terrible thing to say.

[–] HumbleFlamingo@beehaw.org 5 points 18 hours ago

This is my current hope that the sane states can cobble something together and hopefully hire a lot of the talent at those agencies that will be looking for work.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Remake is a funny way to say "burn to the ground"

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Much like controlled burns for forest health. The government will be burnt down and hopefully something better will grow.

Doubtful, but ya know. I've been wrong before.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 2 points 3 hours ago

... you are being sarcastic, right?