this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
174 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
4255 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 104 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Speaker Johnson can go fuck himself.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 51 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Nah. His son will get an alert and that will just be even weirder.

I’m not making this shit up.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Meanwhile he fervently supports a man that bangs pornstars

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, but what the literal fuck.

[–] MumboJumbo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

They're accoutabilibuddies.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 55 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Someone with a shred of ethics on this ethics committee better fucking leak this.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The leaks have started.

Two credible witnesses stated to the panel they saw Gaetz fuck a kid.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

But don't say - or imply - that he's a kid-fucker, because, they were 17 or something? I'm still not understanding that argument...

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Here ya go people, these are the ones you gotta call:

Democrats

Ranking Member Susan Wild, Pennsylvania

Veronica Escobar, Texas

Mark DeSaulnier, California

Deborah K. Ross, North Carolina

Glenn F. Ivey, Maryland

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Wild is out next year, so just maybe. Come on, Susan, put that donation to work!

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 65 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

"People can't know who we are and all the crimes we commit, it would be devastating!"

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 12 points 5 hours ago

Along the same lines, "we've investigated ourselves and our allies and we cannot allow the report to see the light of day ".

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 34 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I love how he throws up the excuse, "...that is not the way we do things in the House,..." as tho' propriety or social or even governmental norms mean anything whatsoever to him or the rest of the GOP.

And then this reversal after nearly 24 hours go by, "Johnson’s comments also mark a reversal after he said on Thursday, “the speaker is not involved with what happens in ethics. Lots of important reasons for that.”Johnson’s comments also mark a reversal after he said on Thursday, “the speaker is not involved with what happens in ethics. Lots of important reasons for that.”

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 3 points 3 hours ago

Of note is that he had a sit-down with Dear Leader before that 180 on "...the speaker is not involved with what happens in ethics. Lots of important reasons for that."

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Only needs to "make sense" in the moment. And only to certain people. Everyone else can get fucked. And don't be bringing up my past statements! (these are not my own personal beliefs)

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 24 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I mean, not really, if I'm honest.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Then why aren't you guys using your second amendment to do something about it huh? People from the US keep arguing with the rest of the world that the second amendment is important but clearly you guys are all talk no walk, it's just an excuse to compensate for something by owning a bunch of guns, not a way to guarantee that you will be able to defend yourself against the tyranny of the government.

[–] simplymath@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's been a week. Let them cook!

Trump was nearly assassinated twice this year-- 3 times if you count the Iranian plot that didn't get out of the planning phase.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Can a freedom of information request bypass this?

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Next up: Congress and/or the Supreme Court overturns the Freedom of Information Act on the grounds it compromises national security and hurts their feelings.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's clearly an attack on Conservatives and weaponization of facts! /s

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

It's LAWFARE, is what it is, you GUYZ!

{sobs}