this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2611 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Future UN climate summits should be held only in countries that can show clear support for climate action and have stricter rules on fossil fuel lobbying, according to a group of influential climate policy experts.

The group includes former UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon, the former president of Ireland Mary Robinson, the former UN climate chief Christiana Figueres and the prominent climate scientist Johan Rockström.

They have written to the UN demanding the current complex process of annual “conferences of the parties” under the UN framework convention on climate change – the Paris agreement’s parent treaty – be streamlined, and meetings held more frequently, with more of a voice given to developing countries.

“It is now clear that the Cop is no longer fit for purpose. We need a shift from negotiation to implementation,” they wrote.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The thing is, negotiation is always easier than implementation, which is why it comes before.

It's pretty clear at this point we're going to stop climate change right around as fast as technology forces us to. I don't see any other plausible path.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

technology forces us to

Huh? What does this even mean?

How can anyone be this optimistic about "fixing" climate change?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 minutes ago

I'm talking about solar, EVs and batteries. It's straight-up cheaper to not use fossil fuels now.

Don't worry, I'm still pretty doomer about it. The planet's still going to get a bit messed up, and we'd have just kind of boiled ourselves like a frog if we hadn't gotten lucky with cheap renewables suddenly appearing.

[–] Not_mikey 2 points 4 hours ago

But they're hosting it in a different petro-atate this year. They might actually agree cutting emissions is a thing that may need to be done , possibly, in the foreseeable or distant future.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Who would have thought that a conference called COP would be a self-indulgent, abusive failure?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago

They never were. Letting the fox run the hen house will always fail. Once you realize all of the UN and analogous environmental orgs/events (IPCC, COP, etc) are politically/corporate managed, and do not align with the scientific consensus, you realize they only exist to greenwash and legitimize for-profit interests, and inaction.