this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
455 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 3 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

They could have been doing this the whole time lol.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 12 minutes ago

Starting 40 years ago. They've been tripping over themselves to throat the Corporate dick for decades.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I just don't get why we're not training and endorsing out the next group with all this press. Sanders and Warren need to back and/or start a coalition of progressive up-and-coming leaders that they can help hone and introduce to the larger political landscape while they have the energy and influence. They need to stop being the only torch bearers and start bringing in underlings. Idc if they follow them around like a posse, might actually be better if they did. I would cuddle with Sanders all night if I could, I'm just tired of his name being the only one catching attention. The will try to bury any movement with him when his time comes, best to get ahead of it so momentum can keep going.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 11 minutes ago

Warren lost any credibility in 2016. She shattered her legacy as fully as Biden is draggin his own name through a river of shit now.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 16 points 12 hours ago

It's kind of scary to think that this man could literally die any day and there'll be nobody to take his place.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Warren can go fuck herself, She was one of several that backed out of the 2020 race to kneecap Bernie Because he was projected to win the Democrat nomination. People like Warren fucked all of us.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

FWIW she actually didn't back out with the moderate candidates before Super Tuesday. She did after splitting the progressive vote between her and Bernie, giving Biden the win.

[–] x3x3@lemm.ee 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Do people still feel the bern?

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 71 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Form your own party. Dump the useless liberals. Reconstitute the SPA and team up with the unions.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Do a hostile takeover of the GOP instead. Many states don't care why party you register as, and if they do just register as a Republican and vote in their primaries. Pick a socialist candidate and get them to run as a Republican, and vote for them. This is in essence what Trump did, but of course he did it for fascism and got Nazis to vote Republican. The same strategy can work for anyone else. This can start in safe blue states where no one votes in the GOP primaries and spread from there.

This is a far more realistic strategy because third parties are vulnerable to the spoiler effect and will always fail due to people being worried about electing Republicans.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 30 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

Thats more of a step 2 or 3. Step 1 is that everybody needs to start putting pressure on the DNC and make sure they understand that we’re not going to take it anymore. And I’m not referring to that bullshit “not voting” rhetoric, because not voting is tantamount to voting republican.

Once the DNC is forced to listen to us plebs again, then it’ll be a good time to look at breaking out into more parties. But we need to put the fear of whomever they pray to in them first.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

That's what they did this election, and we got fascism and the DNC doesn't matter anymore. So now what?

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

You know you can do more than pressure them, right? You can get involved with your state party, which in turn elects the leaders of the national party. You can vote in the primaries and kick out corporate Dems. We know this works because it's precisely how the fascists took over the Republican party.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The dnc is never going to listen to the plebs because they only answer the money, and we don't have it. As long as people keep participating in their game of electoral politics, nothing will change. Let them lose several elections in a row, and maybe they'll see the light or fade off into obscurity, which is the preferred method.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Doubt we have two or three elections left in us.

Look, I’m right there with you and this defeatist feeling. You and me by ourselves can’t do shit. But guess what? There’s millions of us. And for decades it’s been beaten into our heads that we are powerless; that we are nothing because we are not rich.

There was a time where there was a group of people who were treated far worse than we’re being treated now. They had so much less than us, and got treated so much worse than us. Yet somehow, they fought back. And while they’re still fighting, they’ve made huge inroads with the status quo that it’s left its mark for the rest of time.

If they can do that, then the least we can do is scare the shit out of a bunch of idjits at the DNC.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The reality of American political process is that it takes at least a billion dollars to run a Presidential campaign. (Thanks, SCOTUS) That kind of money doesn't come from unions, social activists, or proletariat donors. It comes from corporations and billionaires, and those people don't like revolution.

Until someone can demonstrate that you can get more votes with progressive, worker-friendly policy proposals than with a well funded propaganda machine, the DNC is going to keep chasing the less conservative billionaires. And no third party will even be relevant.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

As long as the DNC is chasing billionaires, we have no second party.

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee -4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I mean we very obviously do. We have two corporate oligarch parties, but I would much rather have the tech billionaire club that brought us the Gates foundation or the Allen institute and isn't actively trying to kill a large portion of the country than the one that sees what Israel is doing to Palestine as a good model of how to clean up the riffraff

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean we very obviously do.

No. We have a viable party that chases billionaires with credibility behind it, and the Democratic Party that chases billionaires while pretending that they are for working people, and kills their own viability because they have no credibility with either group.

As long as they chase billionaires, Democrats are not a viable second party. From a functional standpoint, we have only one party.

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee -2 points 4 hours ago

Does viable have a different definition for you that doesn't include winning roughly half of elections?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 13 hours ago

The thing is, a message that’s simple, resonates, and allows people to blame others will always win out over a message calling people to pull their own weight and do the complicated but correct things.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

If they really cared about "country over party" they'd vehemently support ranked choice voting at all levels of government and an end to gerrymandering. Even though the Democrats aren't really extremists our political system will continue to prop up extreme views if everything is identity politics and there are only two you can choose from.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Yup. Call your Senators and tell them you have no faith in the party leadership, and that Chuck Shcumer cannot continue as Senate Minority Leader. If they're up for reelection in the next two years, tell them you're happy to support a primary challenger if it's the only way to get change.

[–] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 17 hours ago

Step 1 is already done, and now institutional resistance from inside the party is the problem. So it is in fact time for step 2, there’s enough of a body of voters to start building it.

The trick is that to subsume the DNC in the next ten years or so, the party has to form a coalition with it for now while remaining separate. That could achieve two goals: first, put a lot of pressure on Republicans they aren’t ready for. Next, create a strong leftward tension that just isn’t represented right now and which the Democrats will be walled off from controlling.

It’s sort of what happened with the Tea Party / MAGA.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 16 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Good on Warren for saying this. I think that the attacks on Warren for staying in the 2020 primary were really overboard. She would have been a great candidate 🥲

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 51 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Warren, along with the other candidates, colluded with the DNC to drop out en masse in favor of Biden. She, unlike Bernie, is a DNC card-carrying member who, despite her positive work and Progressive stance on Wall Street, played along with the machinations of the Democratic party. They ignored the will of the people.

If she had endorsed Sanders instead of accusing him of lying (second link), we might have had a different outcome. Moreover, Hillary implied he was sexist - a laughable accusation.

Warren lacked the convictions she needed when the time was right.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Holy shit, you just mind blasted me with a memory I had lost. That whole shit show between Bernie and Warren during a debate where she acted all fluffed and pissed off because Bernie was apparently somekind of sexist?! or at least the media and her team tried to play it that way but it completely backfired if I remember right.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, that was the gist of it.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

She should have gotten the fuck out before super Tuesday.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 17 points 17 hours ago

Or ran in 2016 like Bernie asked her to do. But she sat it out because she wanted Clinton to run.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Sanders has been trying this entire time. It's not his fault the DNC won't listen to him.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Too late. This shit is done.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Funny how you're getting downvoted, but this post saying the same thing isn't.

Do better, Lemmy. Quit dogpiling; this isn't Reddit.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 18 hours ago

If you make the exact same low content post a half hour after someone else, you're probably going to catch some downvotes.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Well that's because this post was made a half hour after the other post. Too little, too late to grab all of them sweet sweet fake internet points.