Intel has excellent transcode, even in their igpus.
I use an arc750 specifically for transcode, av1 runs at ludicrous speeds, but don't do an Nvidia, they kind of suck because they dont support vaapi, only nvenc/nvdec and vdpau.
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
34 points (94.7% liked)
Selfhosted
40184 readers
687 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The Intel GPU is probably better
QuickSync is usually plenty to transcode. You will get more performance with a dedicated GPU, but the power consumption will increase massively.
Nvidia also has a limit how many streams can be transcoded at the same time. There are driver hacks to circumvent that.
Most Intel GPUs are great at transcoding. Reliable, widely supported and quite a bit of transcoding power for very little electrical power.
I think the main thing I would check is what formats are supported. If the other GPU can support newer formats like AV1 it may be worth it (if you want to store your videos in these more efficient formats or you have clients who can consume these formats and will appreciate the reduced bandwidth).
But overall I would say if you aren't having any problems no need to bother. The onboard graphics are simple and efficient.
If it is working for you as is, no need to make a change
For an old nvidia it might be too much energy drain.
I was also using the integrated intel for video re-encodes and I got an Arc310 for 80 bucks which is the cheapest you will get a new card with AV1 support.
Yeah, using the a750 the same.
Can't wait for next Gen arc with vvc (x266) support.
Is x266 actually taking off? With all the members of AOmedia that control graphics hardware (AMD, Intel, Nvidia) together it feels like mpeg will need to gain a big partner to stay relevant.
Google is pushing av1 because of patents, but 266 is just plain better tech, even if it's harder to encode.
This same shit happened with 265 and vp9, and before that, and before that with vorbis/opus/aac.
They'll come back because it's a standard, and has higher quality.
Maybe this is the one time somehow av1 wins out on patents, but I'm encoding av1 and I'm really not impressed, it's literally just dressed up hevc, maybe a 10% improvement max.
I've seen vvc and it's really flexible, it shifts gears on a dime between high motion and deep detail, which is basically what your brain sees most, while av1 is actually kind of worse than hevc at that to me, it's sluggish at the shifts, even if it is better overall.
Look up the GPU on these charts to find out what codecs it will support: https://developer.nvidia.com/video-encode-and-decode-gpu-support-matrix-new
NVENC support will tell you what codecs your GPU can generate for client devices, and NVDEC support determines the codecs your GPU can read.
Then compare it with the list of codecs that your Intel can handle natively.
Thanks!
Both the 2060 and the 1060 don't support AV1 either way, so I guess its pointless to me.
I ran a 1650 super for a while. At idle it added about 10W and would draw 30-40W while transcoding. I ended up taking it out because the increased power wasn't worth the slight performance increase for me.
Yeah look like a lot... Probably not worth it.
If the iGPU is getting the job done, I would leave that alone. You could add a GPU and pass it through to a gaming VM. But that is an entirely different project.
Could be an interesting project tough, will definitely think about that. Not top priority, but why not since the hardware its free?
Power consumption, if you care about that.
Yes, but if I can stream games to my mobile device that could be an acceptable treadeoff, if the card doesn't drain too much when idle
I would avoid it, if you care at all about availability and downtime. The result will probably not be great, you need to ensure the server side gets enough resources under load, and setting it up may require constant restarts if things aren’t immediately working as expected.
Nonetheless, here is a link where someone did essentially exactly that on NixOS: https://astrid.tech/2022/09/22/0/nixos-gpu-vfio/
I only have a GPU because my CPU doesn't have any graphics. I don't use the graphics anyway, but I need it to boot. So I put our crappiest spare GPU in (GTX 750 Ti) and call it good.
I wouldn't bother. If you end up needing it, it'll take like 15 min to get it installed and drivers set up and everything. No need to bother until you actually need it.
Host steam-headless and use the GPU for that so you can have remote gaming on your phone anywhere you have 5G
Cool idea!