this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
109 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19118 readers
3487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nothing new. He’s going to staff his administration with yes men. Same as Trump always does.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not for the first round of appointments in 2017. Tillerson, Pruitt, Ajit Pai, DeVos, etc. were all industry insiders with their own harmful agendas who resigned as soon as they gutted whatever specific parts of their agencies they wanted.

So, frankly, yes men are probably less harmful.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not quite true the last time around. A dozen former advisors called him unfit for office. If they were yes men they would have kept their mouths shut and waited for the call to go back to his administration. This might actually be good news for America. Donald Trump is a fucking moron and it sounds like nobody in his new administration will call him out for being a moron, they'll just go along with whatever stupid ideas he has.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, he hires who he thinks will be yes men, then the yes men get in and often realize it’s worse than they thought, they either don’t do what he wants or make him look bad, then they bail or get fired. Been like this for decades with Trump. In office and in private business.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah they seem to keep getting dumber too, which is a silver lining of sorts

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You'd have to be if you don't know what's in store for you by now.

That or you just have a bootlicking fetish.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want to make sure now that we know who the real players are, the people who will actually deliver on the president’s message, the people who don’t think that they know better than the duly elected president of the United States.

Yeah. We're fucked, no matter who he picks. But there is at least a glimmer of hope that this means that we'll just get ordinary yes men and not "Project 2025" yes men. There is a glaring flaw in Project 2025, as far as Donald Trump is concerned: it wasn't his idea to begin with. And if he goes too fast with it too quickly, people might think that the Heritage Foundation is pulling his strings. And he has to be the boss, he can't abide even the appearance that he is taking orders from anyone else.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

This is literally the only silver lining. He isn't a true believer, so his narcissism could save us from some of the worst of these nutjobs ideas.

At the end of the day, Trump wants to think everyone loves him.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm just glad the country still has a month and some change left.

After January though... ugh

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Enjoy the holiday season. Spend time with your loved ones. Remind yourselves what keeps you going and stay strong in the coming years.

There are families in Gaza who still manage to endure, citizens of Ukraine who have endured the full strength of the Russian army, families in Sinaloa who go through cartel checkpoints taking their kids to school...

We'll get through this. Who knows, maybe we'll even find this to be the catalyst for the changes we always knew would need to happen to thwart the inevitable oligarchy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Is Junior going to be head of the DEA, I wonder? Seems that might be a great place to get some really good coke.