this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
51 points (93.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8513 readers
860 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daellat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I think of metacritic wanted to remain relevant as a source of finding out the opinion of people on a game they should have stepped in like 5 or more years ago but I wish them luck turning it around now

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 30 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The impression i got from the article is you can say "this game is the worst zero stars" and you're fine but "this game is for degenerate f******" is a no.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 22 points 22 hours ago

Sounds fair.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, because one has at least a chance of being a genuine opinion and the other is some hate-crime bullshit. Is that confusing?

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nope! It's what I'd hope. I guess I was a bit confused why there was an article, since I thought erasing hate speech was normal practice. When I was half awake this morning reading it, I wondered if I missed something.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

For “some reason” people are more emboldened than ever to come right and be full-on garbage. And they’re shocked when maybe using targetted language, targetted at margainlized groups no less, draws special attention.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

…but the actual responses that Rook delivers are often a far cry from the perceived intent of the dialogue choice.

From another article I found. Look, I play Origins and I played Dragon Age 2 and I played Mass Effect 2 and…that’s just Bioware. They’re not good at writing dialogue and their games are the Call Of Duty of the Fantasy RPG genre.

I saw one example that it clarified what impact a choice would actually have by saying “this would establish a trans identity” and frankly them not being trusted to write good dialogue so many times makes clunky shit like that kinda necessary. It also suffers from the Tiffany Effect in that “Trans” is not a word that lends itself to immersion in a fantasy world.

Dragon Age games just aren’t that deep and ya’ll need to just admit it.

P.S.: I might still get Veilguard on sale and frankly the game looks like it might be the most interesting that they’ve put out so far. A few clunky attempts at inclusion shouldn’t stop you from buying a game and if it does then I don’t really give a shit about your opinion.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 1 points 6 hours ago

Agree with your points and I think the characters look cartoonish. What I’ve seen of the dialogue looks awful. I’m a patient gamer and enjoyed DA:I, but might just completely skip this.

[–] Godwins_Law@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't care at all about the anti woke idiots but objectively it looks like a bad game.

Origins is one of my favorite games of all time.

I lost a lot of faith in bioware after Iquisition. Veilgaurd seems like a shittier Inquisition.

Many reviewers turned down the difficulty to make the health spongy, repetitive combat go faster and the writing quality is Terrible.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I think it looks badass, I've been watching streams on twitch and it's right up my alley so I'm buying it. If for any reason to piss off the jackasses that are hating just for hates sake.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I can’t finish any bioware games because I always get so angry at the options and dialogue yet I see them being praised all the time.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They’re pretty and simple and haven’t historically pushed many boundaries. They’re “safe” games, fairly good to look at, and their worlds can be cool even if the characters and story lack depth.

But at the same time I could not have played them and my life would be no different.

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I think nobody should be discriminated against because of their gender, but what the developers did to those dialogues was horrific

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Those dialogues go frickin' haaard, dude!

(I hate myself for even writing this.)

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t see any in the story, do you know of some examples?

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Dunkey had some fun examples. A lot of marvel-esque quippy dialogue that really sunk in quality since the last game.

The scene most reviews reference is a badly written scene about misgendering. Crazy part is older games in the series handles these topics tremendously well while keeping the player immersed.