this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
213 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
6367 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’s running mate, suffered a personal setback in the 2024 election as he lost his home county, Blue Earth, to President-elect Donald Trump.

Trump won 49.6% of the vote there, while Harris received 48.3%, marking a symbolic defeat for Walz, who built his political career in the area.

Walz, a former teacher and congressman known for his moderate stance, had previously turned a Republican seat Democratic and won Minnesota’s governorship by a large margin in 2018.

His campaign faced challenges, including scrutiny over past statements about military service, which the Trump campaign leveraged as a “Stolen Valor” issue.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 176 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Fucking brutal.

I mean wow. The hometown hero plays before an empty arena.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 109 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

The hits really keep coming today

I'm not even lying yall I just got home and cried for a while sitting in the work van

I also looked at some guns today

This is rough

Edit: I feel I should make it clear, I'm not a risk to myself or anyone, I'm just fucking terrified

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

It's a good idea to arm yourself. Protect yourself and your own.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 42 points 17 hours ago (12 children)

We should have just turned the convention into a mini-primary, like Obama wanted. Maybe this was the reason why he was so hesitant to endorse Kamala. He wanted her to earn it because thats how you get people to vote for you.

Jesus christ someone couldn't have just pushed Biden down some stairs in like, February? Not like a bunch, but maybe 3-4? Just enough for us to have had some kind of testing of the candidates?

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 44 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It's mind-blowing how badly the DNC fucked this all up. They learned nothing from history, theirs or their opponent's. If that party doesn't actually crumble as a result of this, both from internal and external pressures, I'll be amazed.

I'm so angry. And scared. All at once. Just miserable really.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If that party doesn’t actually crumble as a result of this, both from internal and external pressures, I’ll be amazed.

Oh the Irony, this is exactly what I thought would happen to the Republicans.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

We could hope but the fact is, the right wing in America is organized and the left just isn't. Evangelical conservatives have been working for this for years, and it's gotten them results - no Republicans would give up power to voice their actual dissent meaningfully. They bought the ticket, they're taking the ride.

The Democrats are just a flimsy mishmash of corrupt manipulators. They haven't had a coherent plan for ages. And now, they've got nothing, and a man is about to retake office who's threatened to use the State against his political opponents.

If I were a top Democrat right now, I'd be thinking real hard about whether the party even has a future, long-term.

[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

If I were a top Democrat, I'd be thinking real hard about whether it is going to be safe to stay in the country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I think Pete Butigeg would have been a stronger candidate.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 9 hours ago

So you think someone who was incompetent in his job in the Biden admin, failed in primaries, only has real experience as a mayor, is gay, and in 2020 was incessantly ridiculed by insecure men as "mayo Pete" and endless permutations of "butt"-xyz due to being gay....would have won.

Lol

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Speaking from across the pond, I think Pete would have been brilliant... but then that's hardly part of the job description any more is it? A breeze block with the ability to talk shit and grift would unfortunately be a far more electable candidate this year.

Plus, if electing a woman was too troublesome for people to handle, what would happen if they fielded one of the gays!!!?!??

It's a disgrace really. Either Pete or Kamala would have been a safe pair of hands.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm also from the UK but from what I could tell at least Pete has some personality. Kamala ran as the establishment manifested in human form, clumsily avoiding questions or policy details in media appearances. She was polling at 4% of popularity amongst democrat voters during the 2020 primaries. I think those factors were more influential than her being a woman,

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)
  1. Don't kill yourself

  2. If you decide to buy a gun, I suggest a 1911, they're fun to shoot!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 50 minutes ago

Are the non .45 variants just as fun?

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I think they're implying for safety.... not for an easy way out.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I did my training on the Beretta M9 and the Mausberg 500.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Neat, the M9 is a good choice, and 9mm is plentiful and cheaper than 12 gauge.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Meh. Its just what I was trained on. I've never been an enthusiast.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hold on, you were trained on a shotgun and a handgun? No rifle? Are you a cop?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

No, we trained M16 as well, but spent way more time on M9/ shotgun. My assumption was always that our job was just to be targets in the case something actually happened. I also trained 50 cal.

I'm interested if you can figure out what service I was in based on what I've told you so far.

[–] mbfalzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I mean, in the US I'm pretty sure only Navy deals with shotguns, I think to prevent hull penetration? Coasties might for the same reason, but I've never hung out with any

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Without going into profile history, and assuming American, I'm guessing a land based service, either the Army or Marines. Seeing as the Marines had M16s longer than the Army did. I'm going with Marines.

That said, I have a hunch you might be European somehow. Maybe Germany from how you misspelled Mossberg? You'd have to be NATO, but I'm not super knowledgeable about the German services.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Nope. My secret is safe. I'll give another hint. Those were the only fire arms we carried underway, and they were mostly considered a joke. Especially the 50cal.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

The 50cal is a dead give away (imo).

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This just raises the question for me about electronic voting machines. I know that 12 states are using machines with no paper trail, I wanna know if my suspicion that Wisconsin may be one of those is correct.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 48 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

how is it possible for every piece of news to keep getting worse

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 38 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't even news. Walz is from a deeply red area of the state. There was basically a 0% chance they went blue.

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, home advantage is less and less relevant every year. Once upon a time this would be news, but it's a new era and he wasn't even the presidential candidate.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

I suggest you buckle up.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 43 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

If people knew what Blue Earth is like, this wouldn't be surprising.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, sure we’ve got Mankato, but there’s a reason he was the first democrat elected to congress in forever from CD 1.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 14 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I'm really wondering if there's been election interference from GOP agents. Republicans are known for projecting, so I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago

This isn't election interference. Wals is from a very red county. This wasn't news for anyone from MN. It was just an easy headline.

It would have been far more newsworthy if they had voted for him.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

We're morons manipulated into voting against their interests, securing the election for Trump? Absolutely. Unfortunately though, he won the votes fair and square. Democrats sucked at messaging, voters sucked at being decent fucking humans. Now we all get to enjoy the consequences of their psychopathy.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

There was plenty of misinformation peddled by foreign actors(edit: and domestic ones tbh). Call that what you will

load more comments
view more: next ›