this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
337 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

32465 readers
1072 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

actually awesome and fast search engine (depending on which instance you use) with no trashy AI and ADs results also great for privacy, if you don't know which instance to use go to https://searx.space/ and choose an instance closest to you

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kaiyo@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I mean it's often better than nothing, but it is a meta search that still often uses Google or Bing to gather results. IMHO, cut off the need for that data on the whole and use an option like Mojeek

[–] Steve@communick.news 66 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For all their talk of doing things different with their own index and rankings. Mojeek is following exactly what Google did. It's still an ad based business model that makes users into products to be sold to advertisers. They're good now, while still trying to build market share. But once their investors get hungry, the enshitification will commence.

[–] Mojeek@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (10 children)

we make money mainly from our api, our investors are patient private capital and we don't take vc, appreciate your point but these are fundamentally different situations, our ads (when they run) will also be contextual so more of a ddg situation than a "makes users into products to be sold to advertisers"

fair enough if it's not for you though

[–] pinkystew@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know if the comparison is inaccurate.

You make money from advertising to your users ("ddg situation" notwithstanding), are beholden to your investors (private status notwithstanding) and need to see more users to increase revenue. The person above you is saying that this model is what will drive you to eventually be as bad as Google. Do you understand?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

API index access is an important difference.
If it was only that, without public facing ad driven search, I'd be more impressed.

Maybe if you removed the adds, and severely rate limited your own public facing search, so it's more of a demo than an actual service. This would force you to solely make money off the API access, without directly competing against those customers.

That would be an honest buisness model. One that doesn't turn users into eyeballs for advertising. Which seems to me, to be the most insidious problem of the modern internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bullshitter@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Mojeek reminds me of early Google results which only searches title and inurl I like it

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

~~You can use Mojeek with SearX~~ Nvm with nothing enabled but Mojeek returned no results, I wonders why is that?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Aren't all search queries available to whoever hosts an instance? In my eyes this is much worse to privacy and a much bigger risk unless you really know who is behind your chosen instance. I would trust some a company a bit more with safeguarding this information so it does not leak to some random guy.

[–] sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've always gotten the impression it was mostly intended to be self hosted. I've self hosted it for something like a couple years now, runs like a clock. It still strips out tracking and advertising, even if you don't get the crowd anonymity of a public instance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] macgyver@federation.red 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

As someone who hosts an instance, news to me lol

Edit: Developer says this can't be done currently? Reddit comment

[–] Derp@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Of course it can be done, check your web server logs.

If you are using GET requests to send search queries to searxng, what you searched for will show up in the logs as

2024-10-31 123.321.0.100 /?query=kinky+furry+pictures

If you use POST requests the server admin can also easily enable logging those.

People hosting searxng can absolutely see what you searched for, along with your IP address, user agent string etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Companies are definitely selling your data. Use a VPN.

[–] Derp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A VPN will not save you, they are easily worse for privacy in terms of user tracking. It centralises your entire web traffic in a single place for the VPN provider to track (and potentially sell).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, i wish i had the same experiencr

The couple of times I tried it out, the search results where barely accurate

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Try kagi. It's paid at $5/mo., but you get 300 searches to try it out.

[–] usernameusername@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd use it if its public instances didn't get rate-limited so often

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Been rocking self-hosted Searxng for the last 3 weeks now as my default search engine; it's as good or better than DDG and certainly better than Google. Results I need are usually within the first three items, no extraneous shit.

I thought I'd just try it out, but it's staying. The ability to tune the background engines is awesome. My search history is private (though I wasn't that worried about DDG, there was no way in fuck I was using Kagi) since it's running it's searches via a VPN and returning me results locally.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How is it compared to DDG?

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I never use DDG before, but I think it's pretty similar since DDG and SearX index their results from Bing (SearX and also index from Google, qwant... if you enable them), but SearX is decentralized and open source but DDG at core is not, you also have to trust DDG with your info (who know? maybe they lie about their privacy policy but I hope not)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's like using google from 2000's; thanks for sharing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] egsaqmojz@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i get a lot of simpsons pictures in the image results for some rsn

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago
[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

same here but with hentai on searx.be

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's pretty nice. The REST API for running searches makes running SearxNG worth it, if nothing else.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Could you elaborate on what you mean by that?

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's ok at best, when it works. When it runs out of API hits for the day at noon, you need to use something like https://searx.neocities.org/ and retype your search multiple times until you manage to hit an instance that can actually perform a search.

Also, no suggestions.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Self host it, it's nothing to set up.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sga@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you are on a desktop, you can run it locally, you are much less likely to be rate limited, but this comes at cost of your ip being still visible to google or whatever search engine you choose to scrape from

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ben_dover@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

have been using it for a while on my mobile and so far i like it better than ddg or startpage

[–] Anon518@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I checked it out, but most of the public instances I looked at use google + bing. I think I only came across one that used Mojeek, but they deranked it so google results were still at the top.

Yeah you can customize them -- if you never clear your cookies.

Pretty much need to self-host it to customize it.

[–] helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if you never clear your cookies.

They allow you to use a link instead for saving settings, which can also be used to set as your default search engine

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›