this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
478 points (96.7% liked)

pics

19493 readers
950 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
478
Rebellious Act (i.imgur.com)
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world
 
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

I don't live in a society that profits from my self doubt, I live in a society that profits from making everything more expensive every year

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

So dumb. What's even the point of it? Meaningless text photoshopped onto a completely unrelated picture. Why? Just so they can post to the pics community?

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] netvor@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

🄲🄾🅄🄻🄳 🄱🄴 🅲🅾🆄🅻🅳 🅱🅴 🄲🄾🅄🄻🄳 🄱🄴 🅲🅾🆄🅻🅳 🅱🅴

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

Does "society" [all of us] benefit from your self-doubt? The wording is weird and inaccurate...

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

capitalism. a lot of industries benefit from you hating yourself.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 13 hours ago

Welp I used to love this picture but never really thought to hard into it. You ruined it for me hahaha

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Of course it does. The majority of advertising works this way.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Society does not benefit from advertising. Vast numbers of people hate it and try to block it as much as they can. Others fall victim to it and get manipulated into buying shit they don’t need.

But overall, if 2 competitors are advertising against each other then it can turn into a destructive arms race. They each spend more and more on advertising just to keep taking consumers back and forth from each other! That’s a net negative for society!

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If there are only two competitors for a product, then it is either a niche product or there is room for more competition, usually, who can use disruptive marketing.

The problem is, for very large markets, companies will abuse their position to prevent competition from forming. Coke and Pepsi should not be allowed to simply buy every new drink that comes to market.

Anyway, I digress. The government doesn't have the balls to bust monopolies anymore.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

That was an example that doesn’t really depend on there being exactly 2 competitors. If there are 20 competitors and they’re all spending a lot of money on advertising then they’re all producing a net negative

I mean there’s probably some small amount of money they could spend on advertising that would be a net positive because it would inform the public of the existence of their product. But beyond that, they’ve moved from informing the public into trying to convince the public to buy their product. There’s simply no limit to the amount of money you can spend trying to convince somebody to buy something and no limit your competitors can spend to convince them not to!

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

They are making the point that society is actually harmed by self-doubting individuals, as corporations ≠ society.

[–] netvor@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Even more accurately: society is benefited by constantly exploring (and exercising) multiple different survival strategies (capitalism, collectivism, religion....) at the same time. These various strategies are inevitably in tension, producing tons of overall unhappiness.

Like an octopus spreading its tentacles, trying to explore every crevice of its environment, but sometimes accidentally bumping two or more tentacles together. Sure, the tentacles won't destroy each other but that's not the point: In this metaphor, we are merely the cells on the surface. Our suffering is just part of the whole organism trying to balance exploration with self-preservation.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a drug we can give billionaires so they can think that we are all connected like that?

[–] netvor@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

No, but you could achieve similar effect by giving me a few billion $.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

dans une société qui profite de l'inconfiance en soi?

Selbstzweifel?