this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
557 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

58810 readers
4762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 58 minutes ago

bsky is currently the only social network with a woman of colour ceo, which is pretty awesome imo (i hate how people always try to incorrectly say jack dorsey created it when it erases jay's work)

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I love that a Twitter founder founded Bluesky and the logo went from the outline of a white bird on a blue background to the outline of a white butterfly on a similar shade of blue background.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 55 minutes ago

jack didn't found bluesky he was just on a board which provided some early funding; he had no role in the development.

and the butterfly was partially due to the community. https://bsky.social/about/blog/12-21-2023-butterfly

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 19 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I'd say mastodon is a better choice, mostly so that you're not beholden to yet another profit-focused tech corporation. I'm sure Bluesky is fine right now, but once they have their userbase they will shift to monetization - and you may regret letting yourself become entrenched in the world they control. They're not doing it for your benefit.

That said, I've come to understand that a lot of people kind of like having their content feed controlled by others. When they only see what they ask for, they get bored. So I'm expecting Bluesky to always be bigger than Mastodon.

mastodon blew it by attacking people who had legitimate concerns about the service during the first migration.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's all cyclical anyway. No social media company will reign forever. We've already seen a number of them rise and fall. It's kinda like how different civilizations gained and lost dominance throughout history.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Toys-R-Us fell...nothing is forever.

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Aren't they in Macy's now? Wait, is Macy's still a thing?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The plan for bluesky to for people to start their own instances and decentralize.

[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Go to your favorite content creators and ask them to create a profile on Bluesky. If you don't ask them, how are they supposed to know?

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

I'm still on the fence about that...I think it'd make more sense for many to drop social media and opt for their own site with RSS feeds. A lot of social media for some is little more than a noisier RSS reader. Sometimes even literally with those with auto-playing videos. 😬

[–] ryder9@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Y'all are delulu/out of touch with normal people if you think they're gonna set up an RSS feed

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Nah, I get that normal people wouldn't, but I can dream. It's so much better than making Yet Another Account. Plus I know in set up we're talkin' people pulling the feed into a reader, but also for content creators making sites, loads of sitebuilding software already has RSS baked in, so it's not even that big an ask from them.

If there's another more convenient no-sign-up method of keeping up with sites and stuff online, I'd love to know, 'cause I know many aren't about to use RSS.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

But how would the bots reply? That's what generates foot traffic, which is what brings ads, which is what is not enough to pay for the bills!

Perfect business model, I had a VC review it and got high marks

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

RSS is kinda a pain to set up though, not everyone wants to go through that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

They should know they have options at least. Then they can make the decision for themselves.

load more comments
view more: next ›