this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
6 points (59.4% liked)

Today I Learned

17686 readers
1104 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know if any of the three words "anarcho communist city" are any more than vague approximations when it comes to Çatalhöyük.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

how would you describe it? a no street settlement? a roof way village? a gigantic family house?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

"Proto-city settlement" is generally what it is referred to as by archaeologists.

And it was as "anarcho communist" as pretty much all other human societies at the time. That was just the state of humanity as a whole at the time as far as we know. Hunter/gatherer groups, small farming settlements, and the occasional larger farming settlement like this one. Hierarchies of power hadn't become a thing yet.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kind of a stupid decision to call something pre-currency and pre-codified laws "anarcho communist".

It'd be like calling something born before animal life "vegan" because it doesn't eat animals.

Technically correct, maybe, but very much missing the point of the label.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i needed your comment to realize I forgot to put the wiki link. You can forward your complaint to Bookchin ;)

Noting the lack of hierarchy and economic inequality, historian and anti-capitalist author Murray Bookchin has argued that Çatalhöyük was an early example of anarcho-communism.[40]

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, do you know if any other historians/archaeoanthropologists who would make that same claim?

Not to say it's wrong, but I can see how it would be tempting as a self-declared anti-capitalist to want to interpret the findings in a way that conforms to (and thereby confirms) my worldview.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I heard about Catalhoyuk yesterday.. So i have no clue how scientist are perceiving it. But the construction: all together under the same roof, with no street, is pretty striking.

Obviously this dude calling it "anarcho communist" is biased.. the wiki article seems to purposely avoid a neutral tone to make it clear.
But I can see why he came to that conclusion. I dont think we have any other settlement even remotely resembling this one, to make a more informed guess

[–] scott@lem.free.as 6 points 2 weeks ago

Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!