this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
176 points (95.4% liked)

World News

39019 readers
3193 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Three days to Kyiv!

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’m not sure this is useful information since Russia is mostly unpopulated with a few metropolitan areas? They have the money to keep the war machine going for a while longer.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

1\3 of total budget sounds more impressive, and althoigh that's from 2022, it's a mindblowing metric.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it's comparing apples to oranges to say there's lots of apples. Sure there's lots of apples.

Then there's the thumbnail chart hinting something is crashing when that's not happening. So far they've demonstrated significant resilience against the sanctions we've imposed and their economy has remained stable and returned to growth. If they don't run out of labor and natural resources, they can keep this going for a very long time. I'm not saying this because I want them to be able to. I'm saying it because I'm disappointed at the propaganda in our politics and media that lead us to believe we can crash Russia's economy. This created unrealistic expectations and it probably contributed to the lesser support ro weapons delivery which has led us to the status quo we face today.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

These processes are slow and they put their heads on the table to make sure some gray alternative channel still works. If something, these measures would take effect somewhere in 2030s for the big players. Yet, Gazprom reported negative balance recently, and other resource-oriented conpanies too, so some effect already took place.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Many effects took place. That said I think you're wrong about the speed of the effects. There were quick and sizeable effects. However Russia simply reshuffled the economy. Russia, or any country, doesn't need to export or import anything if they're self sufficient. They can replace the lost income from those exports with public investment into something else. For example military production and soldiers. And that's what they did. Now Russia isn't self sufficient but China has filled the gap for their high tech import needs and is taking Russian fossil fuels in exchange. So is India. Given that Russia has both markets for its export and sources for its necessary imports, I don't believe there's any further effects from sanctions we could expect. That's how I read the tea leaves anyway.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Right, sanctions only work effectively when the two most populous and resource hungry countries in the world don't actively support the sanctioned country. China I understand, as it's a proxy war with the West. India seems to be moving in a direction that I didn't see them moving even a few years ago.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Russia doesn't export high tech into China if I read you right. And it doesn't produce much for it's authonomy in spite for the move for импортозамещение or replacing exports. It still depends on things they import, including chips for military production and some casual things like home devices, ingredients for brewing etc.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I meant they are not self-sufficient in tech but they can fulfill those needs by importing from China and India.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Partially, but most goes through grey channels and would do so. Intel 13k, nVidia 4k, they all happen to get there from China but with more and more variable locations on the way.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

2025, the new 1991

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Russia should just covert to my local currency and wire it to me. It’ll make no different for their 3 day special military operation.

[–] 100@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

just make yourself a manager of some important branch of government and they will do this automatically

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Run as a right winger, especially an outright neo Nazi, in any EU or US country and they'll ship a briefcase of cash to your door.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Orbán will fly two private jets worth of money to you like he did with Trump.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You could start a right-wing podcast!

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This doesn't really seem all that bad to me. The US spent roughly 2.7 billion per week on the Iraq war based on some estimates (2.4 trillion over 17 years), which is the annual budget of Indiana. While Indiana isn't a powerhouse in the US economy, it is still ranked 15th. So for the Iraq war, only 14 of US's 50 regions had budgets that exceeded the country's weekly spending.