this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
123 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4024 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Final (?) Debate thread before the election in 35 days.

Debate begins at 9 PM Eastern, 6 PM Pacific and runs 90 minutes.

Vice Presidential debates are always tricky since nobody has voted for Vice President in living memory.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on his military service.

Expect Walz to attack Vance on the whole "immigrants eating cats and dogs" thing.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on being an assistant coach, at best.

Expect Walz to roll out "Weird!" at least once.

CBS has announced the burden of fact checking will be on the candidates themselves.

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

How to watch here:

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

"How can you watch the VP debate on cable? 

CBS will air debate coverage starting at 8 p.m. ET on CBS broadcast stations and affiliates. Find your local station here.

How can you stream the VP debate without cable? 

The debate can be streamed on the free CBS News app on your connected TV or smartphone, on Paramount+, and all platforms where CBS News 24/7 is available, including CBSNews.com and YouTube. 

Debate coverage on CBS News 24/7 begins at 4 p.m. ET."

Edit Impressive how a debate can go when one participant doesn't have mental health issues! Thanks for coming everybody!

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

Call ing out Vance’s disdain for trump, good

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Does Congress need to pass bills to help border patrol?

Vance: The president has to solve it by helping law enforcement.

JD, isn't that what the bill passing through Congress would do?

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Walz just dropped the pet eating bomb back on JDs head.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really hope Walz hammers Vance on women’s rights and LGBTQ issues. Just make that the focus of the whole thing, because those are the issues that will win in the margins of historically nonvoters. I really hope this campaign can finally understand why many voters are disenfranchised, and start finally enfranchising them.

Vast swathes of voters are unaffiliated because nobody cares about them. I know the dem candidates are capable of caring, but they need to show it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Excellent answer. Humanizing the issue, giving practical information, and raising project 2025.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

Here we go. Yes, women’s rights.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

vance. those economic experts have PhD's but they don't have common sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Vance is now pro-abortion exceptions? Are you kidding me?

Edit: typo

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We're ~25 minutes in, and so far I would say this debate is close, but Walz is edging out Vance. He's not as polished, but he's coming across as more genuine, and he's directly answering.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

The borders aren’t open, you numpty twat. Just keep lying.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

here we go. hold onto your buts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

“Shortage” more like venture capitalism and artificially limiting supply.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Walz nailed the immigration question. Vance is making up lies and using buzzwords.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Why always do this crap, where they act like they're not going to let just babble at their leisure and then they just do it anyway.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There it is, "I don't know the details. But let me tell you about my kids again"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Remember that Walz by his own admission is "bad at debates" and that Vance is (an admittedly insane) Yale law school graduate. Walz has done few difficult interviews, almost every mainstream interview Vance has done has been difficult because he has to defend Trump. I just think it's important to have realistic expectations.

I'm honestly not sure what to expect, but I imagine Vance will seem like a more polished politician and debater. He is awkward and supports ugly things, but he doesn't seem to get goaded easily. If Walz can summon his "everydad" persona effectively to make it appear like there's a normal candidate and weird candidate up there and use his knack for a folksy phrase or comeback, that will probably be the "takeaway."

Due to the format, these debates have kind of turned into tiktok video farming events, so let's see who gets the most meme-able sound bytes. Let the games begin.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

woohoo. vance. lets just say its true carbon emissions cause global warming. lets just say.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It’s great that vance keeps heaping responsibility on Harris for events that happened while she was VP, events which were nothing a VP could affect.

Also, the world was “stable” under trump because tens of millions of people were dying from covid and the world was locked down. If trump wants to take responsibility for the covid virus, go for it.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Walz directly quoting Trump's promises about the wall, including the "Mexico will pay for it."

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Springfield Ohio.

Please bring up cats and dogs. You know you want to. Fucking racist.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Walz is friends with school shooters? Lol whoops

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

I love vance pointing out that maybe they don't want to be with their baby after its born.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Not being “used” maybe the wildlife needs it?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"We're the cleanest economy in the entire world." What the fuck does that mean?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

"You said you wouldn't call me out on my bullshit!" - JD

Dude, you admit to lying about stuff.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

No one’s answering the question.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

now vance is trying to make it that its the democrats who don't believe in climate change. His argument is ridiculous given the signature ombudsman bill.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

exactly . Trump wants issues to run on, not solutions. We just saw this as he tried to manipulate the senate to not fix things so he’d have the problem to rail against and run on. This is anti-American.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Here we go, reproductive rights.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I will say, I'm enjoying this debate more than I thought I would, simply because the moderators seem competent and both debaters are behaving like actual adults, even if Vance is a makeup-wearing Yale-bot.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"I'm rootin' for you." What? Rooting for me to do what?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

woohoo. walz brought up the bill and how its doing the things vance is suggested they are not doing. looking good.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›