this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
785 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58698 readers
5027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyone who has been surfing the web for a while is probably used to clicking through a CAPTCHA grid of street images, identifying everyday objects to prove that they're a human and not an automated bot. Now, though, new research claims that locally run bots using specially trained image-recognition models can match human-level performance in this style of CAPTCHA, achieving a 100 percent success rate despite being decidedly not human.

ETH Zurich PhD student Andreas Plesner and his colleagues' new research, available as a pre-print paper, focuses on Google's ReCAPTCHA v2, which challenges users to identify which street images in a grid contain items like bicycles, crosswalks, mountains, stairs, or traffic lights. Google began phasing that system out years ago in favor of an "invisible" reCAPTCHA v3 that analyzes user interactions rather than offering an explicit challenge.

Despite this, the older reCAPTCHA v2 is still used by millions of websites. And even sites that use the updated reCAPTCHA v3 will sometimes use reCAPTCHA v2 as a fallback when the updated system gives a user a low "human" confidence rating.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Great, so now can I get an add-on to my browser that skips these?

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In use an add-on that does 90% of these for me already on Firefox. I would tell you what it's called but I'm not at my PC.

Which (on a side note) I'd totally go downstairs and check for you, but I just sprained my ankle real bad, and am dreading stairs. Sorry :(

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry to hear about your ankle. When you're able to, I'd also like to know what the add-on is

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

Well we trained them

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

That’s suspicious - I can’t pass 100%. here’s a new captcha for you: make the user do 100 in a row

  • 100% is ai
  • <50% is dumb “ai”
  • in between is a person
[–] devilish666@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So...if CAPTCHA are already beaten by bots what's the point if it still exists ? to mock our weakness ?
In the old days CAPTCHA could do its job, but nowadays nah....even crawler/scrapper/meta bots can bypass it easily.
The real question is why do we as real humans still often fail to beat CHAPTCHA? Are we less human? Are we really robots in CHAPTCHA perspective ?

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To train Google/Cloudflare's AI tools, and to double check against DDOS. That's it.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So now we're going to have AI training other AIs

[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, there's a movie about this .....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sudo@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Pro-tip for webscrapers: using AI to solve captchas is a massive waste of effort and resources. Aim to not be presented with a captcha in the first place.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

we have trained them very well

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Our long international nightmare is finally over!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

There is a Russian captcha solver bot called xevil that costs under $100 (I think, last time I looked) that has been able to solve nearly all captchas for years. You just have to supply it with relatively expensive proxy IP addresses because Google rate limits solve attempts.

So the title of this article has been true for a long long time. Capatchas are absolutely useless except against poor or uninformed script kiddies.

[–] xnx 2 points 2 weeks ago

Unless this was something people could use i dont rly see it becoming much of a problem. Most people dont even use adblockers

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So where's my portable app to do so?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›