this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
800 points (98.3% liked)

Comic Strips

12583 readers
4170 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
800
Must Be Fun (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 

Source

Bonus Panels: Bonus Panels

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _____@lemm.ee 48 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

English is bent to our will in daily life and yet people act like God wrote the law on how to speak English and we're all committing sins of biblical proportions.

No. You know what ? "Me and Mark" is perfectly okay because you understood exactly what the sentence meant. That's the purpose of language.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Several counter-points:

  • There is an unnecessary space before your question mark.
  • Ideally, you should use single quotes when distinguishing words or phrases within the text
  • The phrase 'and yet' is redundant. Simply "yet" would have been more appropriate.

I believe if you check closely, this rebuttal is ironclad.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your rebuttal has no iron or steel covering any spots, thus it cannot be considered ironclad

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

It is also not a rebuttal. It criticizes the grammar and punctuation, but does not offer a counter argument.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

So do me and Mark

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's about respect for the reader or listener. Using correct language eases the burden of deciphering what you are trying to say by using consistent forms. Otherwise it take extra effort for them to unscramble your words and figure out your meaning.

And yes, of course someone can figure out that when you say "me and Mike" you almost certainly mean to say "Mike and I". But you're making it harder for them by not bothering to learn or use the correct form.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

I think it depends on if you're correcting people to better understand them, or correcting them to be correct. Or, to put it another way:

https://xkcd.com/1576/

[–] rbits@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Me and Mike is not any harder to understand than Mike and I. It is harder for the speaker to always make sure they're using the correct form, though. The extra effort for the speaker must also be considered. Sure, if you're writing a book you should probably try to use the correct form, but in casual conversation it does not matter, and is more effort than it's worth (at least in this case)

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Knowledge is knowing that the monster isn’t Frankenstein.

Wisdom is knowing that the monster is Frankenstein.

[–] rbits@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Intelligence is knowing that Scooby Doo taught us that the real monsters are the humans.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Intelligence is knowing that haircut is fucking terrible.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Now I want to see a party of all pedants where everyone enjoys correcting others. Finally, that phrase won't be sarcastic!

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Come have a seat at my D&D table...

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

rolls dice threateningly

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Party of pendants. Huh...

He's the model of a major grammarian.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Since red guy is totally not a monster, it makes much more sense to compare them to the creator than to the monster. And since this is a comic, the words are written and therefore read/ seen or – in universe – watched.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, Red killed and ate his wife.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Guess I suck at reading between the lines...

[–] elidoz@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

honestly, the fault is on you, everyone else (literally everyone) noticed it but you

[–] midnight_puker@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

I never know what anyone is talking about.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I will be with you on your wedding night...

[–] june@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But his hair looks like the stereotypical description of Frankenstein's monster, not Dr. Frankenstein who as far as I am aware doesn't have a stereotyped hair style

That said, my favorite pedantic response would be: Dr. Frankenstein was the monster. And his child should share his last name anyways.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Frankenstein didn't have a doctorate, and the monster murdered people in cold blood. I suppose you could argue that Victor was also a monster (particularly for allowing Justine to die when he could have saved her if he'd spoken up and taken responsibility for his actions) but the monster was definitely a monster, albeit a sympathetic one.

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Seeing as there is very clear paternal symbolism throughout, and even internal dialog of the ~~minster~~ monster referring to the "doctor" as his father, I think it's pretty reasonable to assume the ~~minster~~ monster took the same surname.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's no way the monster would take Frankenstein's surname. He hated him.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 month ago

Many people hate their fathers and still keep their surnames.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I read that as minister and not monster and was very confused. I thought I must have missed a reference to a different movie.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, I made the same mistake!

I suspect it was when he wrote "minister" that led me to read it as "minister", but it really could have been anything. I'm kind of tired, so that might have been it.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I want to party with Dan!

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Green guy = average Lemmy poster

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)