this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
134 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16690 readers
719 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

Lol have fun tendo.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

While the designs were clearly inspired by Pokemon, I don't think Nintendo has any leg to stand on in this case. The connection is flimsy at best., but I'm not a lawyer so I dunno, maybe there's some legal loophole that Nintendo is banking on.

If this case goes in Nintendo's favour, it could open the door for other lawsuits like Stardew Valley could get sued for infringing on Nintendo's Harvest Moon IP, for example. I know that's ludicrous but who knows, the law goes in unexpected directions sometimes.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's a patent lawsuit which might have a better chance than a copyright lawsuit but Nintendo didn't disclose which patent(s) and Pocketpair also doesn't know yet either.

You're right though that any patent Pocketpair is infringing upon would also have likely been infringed by dozens of other games. Nintendo is just upset Pocketpair made millions with a game that appealed to Pokemon fans and want to ensure nobody else does it again.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pocketpair also doesn’t know yet either.

They have the full wording of the lawsuit. I'm sure they know.

You can't just sue somebody on "trust me, bro".

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

I mean...you can. All lawsuits start with an application at a courthouse and that application can say whatever the plaintiff wants.

Here's youtube lawyer LegalEagle reviewing some crazy ones. Like a man who sued David Copperfield for stealing magical powers granted to him by God. Lawsuits can say literally anything in their initial application.

[–] djidane535@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I heard they sue Pocketpair on copyrighted systems, not on the design of the Pals (eg: using an object like a Pokeball to catch the creatures). They certainly have solid legal arguments, which explains why they took their time to find some flaws they could exploit to sue them.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn’t Natsume own Harvest Moon?

[–] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Regardless of who owns the IP, it will open the flood gates of any company suing another for even just taking inspiration from one of their IPs.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Nintendo is going to line up all 40 Palword devs and throw a turtle shell.