this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
98 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
725 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In this video, a Canon print cartridge is opened up and revealed not to contain the meagre 11.9 ml (0.4 fl oz) of ink it is advertised. The proposed solution is to buy a printer designed to be manually refilled with bottles of ink (such as the featured Epson EcoTank ET-2850), though it has only been tested briefly.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I feel like a Brother laser printer is a much better solution unless you specifically need color. Also, if you try and print with a laser printer after a couple months of disuse, it should fire right up and print. The same is not necessarily true of an ink jet, where things may have dried out and clogged.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I use a colour Brother laser printer. It works fine. Granted it's not great for photos but those are cheaper to have printed in a lab, which will give much better results that an inkjet anyway.

[–] clb92@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My biggest problem has been that the ink always dries up, since I don't print very often, and a laser printer has solved that for me. Now, about 3 years later, the black toner is still at 90%, and still working reliably.

My Brother laser printer has told me that my toner is empty three times now for the same cartridge. It eventually refuses to print, but that can be overridden with some undocumented trickery. I have manually overridden it each time, told it that I installed a brand new XL cartridge and it just keeps printing. It just told me, again, that the toner is low - I don't believe it, I'll override it again. It would have forced me to throw out at least 66% of the remaining toner if it didn't have the override.

[–] ByteWelder@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The cost effectiveness difference on the bottles versus sponges is probably much bigger than the video suggests, because a whole bunch of ink is likely sticking to the sponge and never coming out.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] CurrMudgeon@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I've always ordered ink from inkjets.com because it's cheap and their cartridges are completely clear so you can actually see that they're full of ink like you'd expect.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FStoppers - Printer ink, it's a sCaM

Next week - Potatoes, they're a rOoT vEgEtaBLe

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Next week: Why have Nescafé invented a new way to package coffee after their Nespresso pod lawsuit didn't prevent third party compatible pods?