this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
72 points (97.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5209 readers
940 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They have decided to spare themselves and make bunkers. They will retreat while the rest of us burn. Just make sure to block their vaults from the outside before you leave this world.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their security guards will eventually turn on them though, provided they aren't shock collared.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

They dont realize no good end will come. The only way out of this is solidarity and unity.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It will spare them a lot longer than it will the poor, though.

[–] silence7 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Per the article:

as the planet warms further, the increase in risk actually falls heaviest on those swimming in money rather than floodwater.

It may not kill, but it's going to be incredibly expensive.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

Right, but they are rich, they can afford expensive.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well hopefully, they deserve it at least just as much, for most of the them more, than the rest of us

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From a global perspective, the average middle class or even working class American who drives everywhere in an SUV, eats huge portions of meat products at wasteful restaurants, and generally consumes ten times as much as the average person is part of the rich. And yes, we deserve it.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

The 1%. But the .1% of that 1% is who is controlling everything.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

I get the sentiment of the article but I disagree. I live in the Jackson Hole area and I am surrounded by billionaires. They have bought huge ranches and put the surrounding lands in environmental trusts. They have also bought a lot of farmland in the Idaho side of the mountain and also turned it into land trusts. The bottom line is that, thanks to climate change the weather is now milder and by reducing the water demands from farms, the area has plenty of fresh water, even during a drought. When you have the means, you can protect yourself.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

It's funny how, with a little adjustment to the title, we have an even clearer truth: not sparing the rich will make climate change easier on the rest of us... 🤷🏽‍♂️

[–] poshcrow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

at the end of the day, theres more of us than them, they can horde there wealth and be on the wrong side of the climate wars or not.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Article cited : Global economic impact of weather variability on the rich and the poor https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01430-7