this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
1086 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4000 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

For those not fluent in Republican crazy-speak, Kelly’s meltdown was triggered by Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris the night before, barely one hour after Trump all but face-planted on the debate stage. Kelly was especially triggered by Swift highlighting her appreciation for vice presidential nominee Tim Walz’s support of LGBTQ+ rights.

Other right-wing commentators, like Ben Shapiro, took another approach: making fun of Swifties. “Note: if you vote for a particular candidate because your favorite singer is doing so, please don’t vote. You are too stupid to vote,” wrote Shapiro on X. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, the richest man on the planet, threatened to impregnate her.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 122 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"I will impregnate her" -Elon Musk

"She will be raped by Venezuelans" -David Rubin

"Children's Genitals!" -Megyn Kelly

Weird...

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 98 points 6 days ago (23 children)

If they didn't want her to voice her opinion they shouldn't have spent a week making fake ai images of her endorsing Trump. They forced her hand; she could either allow her likeness to be appropriated for a political cause she doesn't agree with, or make her true opinion known.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 61 points 6 days ago (17 children)

Imagine living in the US 💀

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Ikr, im desperately trying to leave

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I must admit that I don't get, why it's such a big deal, that Taylor Swift supports Harris. But seeing the meltdown of the right wing grifters does put a smile on my face.

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

She has 284 MILLION followers. And the Swifties are also like a cult. Granted a more sensible one. But people will support her through anything. And many of those supporters are gen z and just entered the voting pool. The GOP does not want a huge influx of voters.

[–] masinko@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I've seen some graphs / extrapolations where if young voters (18-24) voted at the same rate as older voters (55+), Harris would win by a pretty sizable margin.

That almost never happens, but Swift has a huge influence on young voter turnout.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 6 days ago

I have a good friend that is a Swifty, they are basically another uber fandom with actual irl clout. Apparently she brought over a quarter million potential signups through this.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

She used to be a Country Music darling, and a lot of right-wing Country people still feel like they own her like back when they had her as an underage sex symbol.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago (1 children)

On the flip side, imagine voting for someone because Ben Shapiro is doing so.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Imagine doing or believing anything because of anything that guy said or did. I'm not even sure how anyone can stand listening to him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mobiledecay@lemmy.world 65 points 6 days ago (16 children)

The party of rapists, child molesters and murderers is mad at Taylor Swift. She must've done something right. 🤔

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

It's funny how Taylor Swift mattered when Trump faked her endorsement.

[–] p3n@lemmy.world 59 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The argument that "you shouldn't vote for someone just because your favorite celebrity endorses them" seemed like a much more credible argument before the 2016 election when the winning candidate essentially won by literally being a celebrity.

Prior to 2016, Trump was probably best known for being the host of a reality TV show, and being a "businessman". Taylor Swift is definitely better known, and you could also make a solid argument that she is a better "businessman" as well.

[–] phar@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] drislands@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 34 points 6 days ago

Trump threatened her for her endorsement. Anyone who thinks he has any redeeming qualities is beyond redemption.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago

I'm sure MAGAts are having to do mental jumping jacks from approving of a fake endorsement for Trump to now saying that her endorsement for Harris doesn't really matter and that she's a nobody. The whole thing is dumb either way, but if a pop star's endorsement is what it takes to hold off the fascists for at least 4 more years, then so be it.

[–] unrigged6112@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Why the hate They got the endorsment of quality stars like Kid rock, Kanye, Kevin sorbo, Hulk Hogan, Elon musk,

Al fine gentlemen /s

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago

Celebrities have every right to voice their opinion on national issues.

And, that is not a "zero risk" position.

A recent example is the formerly known: "Dixie Chicks". Research their dilemma.

And in the past, late 1940's, Hollywood had a "Blacklist" which was a very serious shit list which fucked over plenty of people.

Many American celebrities are also citizens with every right to voice their opinion the same as your lawn sign or bumper sticker. Yet, sometimes, it's a really good thing when those celebrities rally their groupies, Swifties, etc.

Like almost always, it boils down to others being jealous of the "power" of other people.

[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 42 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Was anyone on the left that mad when KidRock or Ted Nugent coming out in support of Dump?

No.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

In fairness neither kid rock nor ted Nugent are relevant enough to convince any significant number of people to vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I can't imagine living in such a weird celebrity country.

Very few people give a shit about celebrities here, let alone what they think, let alone what they think about politics. No one would care for who endorsed who, it very much means absolutely nothing.

[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The vast majority of us dont give two shits about any of this either. It's just 24hour news cycle slop. Anything for the clicks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Of course you don't list where "here" is. I'm willing to bet that not only do they care about celebrities about the same as Americans, but also that many of those celebrities they care about are Americans.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

In battleground states the win/lose margin will quite possibly come down to a few thousand votes, particularly in PA. The endorsement might not change anyone's mind, but to her millions of fans it raises the elections' importance for anyone who doesn't "care about politics". It turns a civic issue into a social group issue, and people care more about the latter. It'll pull people reluctant to go to the polls to show up and vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

not beating the "weird" allegations

[–] shortypants@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Megyn Kelly is nasty ~ Donald Trump

Megyn has that short term GOP memory. These people have no soul.

[–] shortypants@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Also, fuck you too Megyn.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago
[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

"Losing it" implies they ever had it

load more comments
view more: next ›