this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
70 points (84.3% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/uY9vT

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Call me a victim of a good PR team but my general impression of Mark Cuban is that he's definitely in the better half of billionaires

That doesn't qualify him for public office of course

[–] Seraph@fedia.io 36 points 1 week ago

Actually philanthropic billionaire? Cool, but we shouldn't have to rely on billionaire philanthropy to get by.

Public office? To be fair he's as qualified as our most recent ex-president.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 21 points 1 week ago

"Better half of billionaires" is a pretty low bar.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

There was a time when I felt that way about Musk so I now have a 20 year probation period before I assume they aren't trying to enslave mankind

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

There's no good billionaire. He's a billionaire because he stole the wages and work from the people below him.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago

He hit a home run with costplusdrugs

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Genuinely probably because he got to be a billionaire in an insanely lucky deal, I feel like that's the only way you can stay (relatively) down to Earth with that much cash.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Not to mention, he tends to spend his money by investing in startups that (as far as I can tell) actually solve a problem. He's not one to cut corners and inflate values needlessly, and he's far more concerned with making a business successful than extracting every penny of profit possible.

Do I think it's bad that one man has as much power has he does? Absolutely. Am I glad that at least one man with as much power as he does uses it to make the world a little better? You bet.

Mark Cuban is not an example of why Billionaires should be allowed to exist, he's just an example of how being a billionaire doesn't NECESSARILY mean you're an evil person.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Seriously, the last thing the Democrats need after Trump's Musk gimmick is a billionaire gimmick of their own.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if Kamala puts that guy in charge of the SEC?

I ask out of curiosity

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I expect nothing less. I also expect some people to eat that literal shit raw with zero self awareness about their reaction to Elon's dumb ass wanting similar.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

It's a big club