this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
273 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

48368 readers
1541 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] garam@lemmy.my.id 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Rocky and OL...

Just their approach aren't as good as Alma or CentOS as upstream. It's just my personal opinion...

I just don't like the CIQ narrative and Oracle that keep pushing Red Hat to corner...

Red Hat being dick because most of downstream being dick, especially CIQ/Rocky.. they steal about 30% of Red Hat contract, while offer cheaper package (quite a lot cheaper, and they don't even work on SIG like AlmaLinux Does), but using RHEL code, and just rebrand it as the best RHEL compatible, Rocky Linux.

OL is worst... Overprice Oracle DB, provide free OL, fork from Red Hat, and slap much higher cost until your company can't pay... well at least OL is honest than CIQ...

People need to see from Red Hat perspective regarding their dick move on exercising their GPLv2, and the upstream code still in git.centos.org. It depends now on downstream for repackage it. So it's still open source... and you can still have Rocky, Alma, OL, just you need to maintain the build pipeline...

And Rocky is broken on Old Thinkpad with 7 row keyboard. Alma, RHEL, and Fedora isn't.

I still can't find the cause, but end up using Fedora on most Thinkpad I have.

Other than that Is Ubuntu... It's... simpler to use, but when you deploy to production or Enterprise env... mostly sucks when they push broken update, and we need to rollback, it's not as simple as dnf history undo... it's also personal opinion, YMMV.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] user8e8f87c@berlin.social 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

@vettnerk I don’t like Mint, because it looks ugly and dated. (But it is good that there is this distribution for all the boomers out there).
I don’t like arch, because what is the point, if you can use Fedora instead.
I don’t like Ubuntu, but the hate against it is much worse than the distribution itself.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody said MX, because MX is the perfect distro! I'm using it since 2016 after years of Ubuntu and some Mint.

MX is the perfect distro. I'm using it with Xfce. Nobody hates it, it's a sign 😜

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Gentoo.

Ain't nobody got time for dat!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] fictitiousexistence@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

RebeccaBlackOS

Because I can only use it on Friday Friday!

[–] Mandy@beehaw.org -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

base arch that isnt a distro from it the forums are elitist tot he point you should never bother the install instructions (before the installer they added only reluctantly) need a phd to understand its running on the worst parts of the KISS principle, its not simple to use, or simple to get around, it simply refuses to add any bells and whistles to make it easier to use

use endeavouros, arco, archlabs, reborn or any number of arch based distros, that way you get the aur, the good part of it

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›