this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
334 points (93.0% liked)

Memes

45589 readers
1368 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The inner circle so to speak

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The thing is, ownership of any of these can change at any time. Bitwarden, Mullvad, and Tutanota could be sold to very different owners.

That is up to and including something like uBlock Origin, which only has one developer, and would suddenly be very different if that developer died and the project had to be forked.

You can never trust that the person who takes on the reigns has the same ideals as the people running them now.

Hell, Mullvad was abused to the point they removed access to Port Forwarding on their VPN service, which has led to many people needing to switch to crummier, shadier VPNs that still offer port forwarding access. That's not Mullvad's fault, but it is an example of them having to change their philosophy and what they offer because of abuse.

Trust should only go so far, and loss of trust should be very easy. There's not a good reason to keep "trusting" something when it has fundamentally changed from its initial ideals.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 24 points 1 year ago

Hell, Mullvad was abused to the point they removed access to Port Forwarding on their VPN service, which has led to many people needing to switch to crummier, shadier VPNs that still offer port forwarding access. That’s not Mullvad’s fault, but it is an example of them having to change their philosophy and what they offer because of abuse.

It's a real shame too. It was a nice feature.

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hell, Mullvad was abused to the point they removed access to Port Forwarding on their VPN service, which has led to many people needing to switch to crummier, shadier VPNs that still offer port forwarding access.

Could you explain what happened?

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

As clear as I can make it out, it seems like it was related to a search warrant that was executed on Mullvad.

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/4/20/mullvad-vpn-was-subject-to-a-search-warrant-customer-data-not-compromised/

Because just a little over a month after the news of the failed raid, there was news of them removing port forwarding.

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/5/29/removing-the-support-for-forwarded-ports/

Emphasis mine.

Unfortunately port forwarding also allows avenues for abuse, which in some cases can result in a far worse experience for the majority of our users. Regrettably individuals have frequently used this feature to host undesirable content and malicious services from ports that are forwarded from our VPN servers. This has led to law enforcement contacting us, our IPs getting blacklisted, and hosting providers cancelling us.

The result is that it affects the majority of our users negatively, because they cannot use our service without having services being blocked.

The abuse vector of port forwarding has caught up with us, and today we announce the discontinuation of support for port forwarding. This means that if you are a user of forwarded ports, you will not be able to add or modify the ports you have in use.

[–] apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

They made a smart call that has probably increased the long term privacy of their users.

People were using port forwarding to host illegal shit, and governments were getting pissed off about it. Mullvad has been able to prove in court that they don't keep logs, but that's not a perfect deterrent; a properly motivated government, perhaps if somebody is using Mullvad to host CSAM, might attempt to legally force Mullvad to put logging in and add anti-canary clauses.

Preventing port forwarding keeps customers as consumers rather than hosters, and avoids this issue.

[–] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 8 points 1 year ago

Same thing just happened with IVPN :⁠-⁠\

[–] Qkall@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

bruh, i can't be the only one confused why state farm's drive safe app was being touted...

[–] Udonezo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

allows their car insurance to spy on their location data and driving habits Is curious about privacy

Okay buddy

[–] revlayle@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love Mole, Shield and Road

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago

Ah, the new pokemon game that just came out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fazoo@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Why do you trust a Germany based secure email over something like Proton? At least Mullvad is Sweden based.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] whileloop@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

KeePass is also a good password manager, it's open source and you get to store the password database anywhere you like.

[–] DarkwinDuck@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have bitwarden and mullvad, but what's the other one?

[–] marcus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

It’s Tutanota, an email service

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

keepass > bitwarden

vpn providers should be reviewed regularly

email is inherintly insecure/non-private, self hosted is best

[–] ArcticLynx@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

why do you prefer keepass to bitwarden? has it better privacy or is it just a personal preference because you like the UI more for example?

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

keepass is a different paradigm. it uses a locally encrypted file. many frontends for it (use keepassxc and keepassdx). dont have to rely on some 3rd party, even if they say they have e2ee. theres no better privacy (and security) for an app than not using it with the internet. im not too concerned about ui for pw manager personally, the less time i spend w it unlocked the better. only (slight) problem for me: multi device usage (i just copy the file onto my phone occasionally). general rule of thumb: if it can be selfhosted, it is best to.

i think bitwarden is the best one of its type, it comes down to your needs and threat model

[–] Jonsk@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk if anyone else mentioned this but bitwarden can be selfhosted.

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

good point!

[–] king_link1@feddit.dk 8 points 1 year ago

I use syncthing to sync my KeePass file, and I highly recommend it. Very easy to set up

[–] ArcticLynx@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I really like the cross device sync, even tho it's a security risk of course. also, I don't know anything about self hosting (might get into it when I got the time), so bitwarden might be the best pw manager for my requirements rn.

[–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's possible to sync keepass using syncthing, i use it that way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mr_1077@monero.town 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For anyone still using Mullvad and wants port-forwarding, I recommend AzireVPN.

Good list! I use all of them too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rambos@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I trust bitwarden, but android app doesnt trust me!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gvasco@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I might swap bitwarden by passbolt as it uses a more recent programming stack, although vaultwarden looks to be a good alternative too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cirkuitbreaker@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of these is Bitwarden. What are the other two?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That mole is sus to me, I am more like into Snakedragons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›