this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024

147 points (99.3% liked)

World News

38529 readers

2662 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

quinten@lemmy.world

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world

147

The world is pumping out 57 million tons of plastic pollution a year (apnews.com)

submitted 1 week ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The world creates 57 million tons of plastic pollution every year and spreads it from the deepest oceans to the highest mountaintop to the inside of people’s bodies, according to a new study that also said more than two-thirds of it comes from the Global South.

It’s enough pollution each year — about 52 million metric tons — to fill New York City’s Central Park with plastic waste as high as the Empire State Building, according to researchers at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. They examined waste produced on the local level at more than 50,000 cities and towns across the world for a study in Wednesday’s journal Nature.

The study examined plastic that goes into the open environment, not plastic that goes into landfills or is properly burned. For 15% of the world’s population, government fails to collect and dispose of waste, the study’s authors said — a big reason Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa produce the most plastic waste. That includes 255 million people in India, the study said.

top 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly I wish journalists would quit blaming 'the world' for stuff like this. It's not 'the world' making all the plastic ... it's big oil and big companies that are.

[+] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk -7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You vote with your wallet. The Give-me-convenience-or-give-me-death cunts leave a trail of disposable contact lenses, toothpicks, dental floss sticks and single use kid's toys all around the beautiful European mountain area I live in.

It's just pure fucking selfishness and it's getting worse

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You vote for the only options u have. Everyone is making this shit. No one is making bio plastics. You don't have the option to not buy a lot of the plastics you consume.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Yup. A while back I remember reading that Germany had a system in place that rated manufacturers' packaging based on recycling - the more unrecyclable/mixed media the packaging was, the higher the import fees/sale taxes..

Dunno if it's still like that, but it seems the most logical way to place the costs of plastic pollution where it belongs ... on the manufacturers.

[–] copd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Brash statement.

Some countries/areas offer options to avoid buying the vast majority of plastics. The problem is that its almost always more expensive to purchase the plastic free alternative.

When money is involved its pretty obvious what happens and what people pick

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

You vote with your wallet.

I checked my credit card statement and I can't find "57 million tons of plastic" anywhere on it.

Meanwhile, I'm walking through literally any store anywhere, and it seems like every conceivable piece of commercial merchandise is trapped in a six-inch thick plastic clam shell. Like, you routinely get more packaging than product. I'm not asking for this. I don't want to purchase it. But I'm told that anything not embedded in a plastic Ft. Knox has a 0.2% higher chance of being shoplifted, so I just need to accept this as a consequence of people voting without their wallets.

[–] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 1 points 1 week ago

And in some countries, we don't vote at all.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Don't look at me I've given up straws

[–] genuine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Actually the world isn't doing anything, the infestation called humanity is doing most of the bad shit going on.

If we just stop the world will return to normal and balance out but for that we need a proper plague...

[–] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plastics are becoming endemic at this point. There are bacteria evolving to live in and consume plastic already. I wonder how our bodies are beginning to change to cope with this.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They don't, bacteria can evolve quickly because they multiply a lot. Humans take about 30 years to create offspring so evolution is pretty much nonexistent on the scale of a human life

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup. Just like the wolves at Chernobyl are evolving to be immune to cancer, but their lifespans are far less than ours. Evolution in humans happens, but it takes a whole lot longer.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just like the wolves at Chernobyl are evolving to be immune to cancer

Wait what

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was wrong. It's not that they're immune, it's that they survive/are resistant to cancer.

https://www.iflscience.com/chernobyls-mutant-wolves-have-evolved-anti-cancer-abilities-72831

https://www.earth.com/news/chernobyl-wolves-have-evolved-resistance-to-cancer/

[–] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah i didn't necessarily mean our DNA, more like our internal fauna, in particular our gut fauna, which has tremendous implications over how our body functions, influencing our brains, metabolism and immune system.

If bacteria are changing and our bodies are about a one to one ratio of human cell to bacteria cells according to recent studies, it follows that bacteria changing does not preclude us from changing as well, since not only are bacteria a part of us, we fundamentally depend on bacteria to be alive. We cannot ever be separated from the evolution of bacteria.

So while our own DNA will not change significantly in such a timescale, that doesn't mean our internal metabolism processes will not change somehow, i would wager. Not only us, but all the animals around us that we eat and live with as well. It's interesting to think, for instance, of vitamins we don't produce but still need and we take from bacteria living inside us. I wonder if similar bacteria would, for instance, evolve to decompose plastics in our bodies or such like.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

That's actually an interesting thought, I'm not sure if that all happens quickly enough to be noticeable within a human lifespan, but it will be interesting to see I suppose. Only time will tell

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We can make the line go up, right? Line must go up. That's what the shareholders are telling me.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://apnews.com/article/plastics-waste-pollution-oceans-global-south-dd9ce2a092c5d5826a3436d9f47764c7

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support