this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
-25 points (22.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3858 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember this? And now...

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any healthy democracy has more than two candidates to choose from on a ballot.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A healthy democracy doesn’t have an electoral college and subsequent unrepresentative (and consequently dictatorial) Supreme Court.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Just to add, a healthy democracy has a first and second round where the second round has only 2 candidates.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

nothing better than the "unfair dems" to spoil a coalition. well, universe we already know they suck (just currently sucking less), so ya got something fresh?

we all need to focus on changing a system that, at its core, ensures a two party system with nearly zero public impact on how america flexes international power - exactly as the monied wish it. I just happen to have an issue with solving the problem by burning the fucking house down with us in it.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, this is exactly what I say to all these 'Imma vote Third Party because Genocide ~~Joe~~Kamala is evil' people. I have no problem with fixing the system so that it doesn't mean we have to pick the lesser of two evils. But 'burning the house down with us in it' is exactly what Third Parties will accomplish in the current system, with the current voters. Donald Trump/Project 2025 must not win. Period.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Are there really that many left?

[–] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

The Democrats, a broken clock like most political parties, happen to be landing on one of their twice daily “right” slots?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for NBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/dnc-war-third-party-candidates-rcna143290
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Republicans? Capitulate and order everyone to be happy that you "compromised.”

Third parties? Fuck. Ing. WAR!!!