Privacy

31981 readers

288 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

294

Danish Justice Minister Under Fire for Pushing Encryption Ban While Using It (reclaimthenet.org)

submitted 2 months ago by grid11@lemy.nl to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You could say that for everyone pushing for an encryption ban. If they use whatsapp, encryption, if they use https websites, encryption. Banning encryption is nigh impossible, it's like trying to ban prime numbers. What they'll actually do is get even easier backdoors and criminalise the masses that use it while still using it themselves.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 months ago

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They don't want to ban encryption, they want to block encrypted chat apps, precisely so they don't have to build backdoors. AFAIK it's not possible to break signal/WhatsApp encryption without access to the targeted device, and once you have access you can get the messages directly without having to break the encryption.

[–] hswolf@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's no encryption that a 5$ wrench and a bit o time can't break

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

What if Randall would sell $5 wrenches with XKCD logo?

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do we know if the WhatsApp encryption is not breakable, if yes how? It could maybe have backdoors inside

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I guess it could, as we have to take meta's word for it, and a quick google search hasn't turned up any independent security audit.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Encryption for me but not for thee.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 16 points 2 months ago

This logic is the foundation of how the regimes rule the peasants.

[–] shadycomposer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It’s a privilege lol

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

This kind of thing just confirms how it's really all about the Power elites keeping an eye out on the plebes trying to organise and change things so that they can kill any such things in the early stages.

Democracy was supposed to slowly bring Autocracies around to its way of doing things but instead what we're seing is the very opposite of that.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago

European aristocracy is scared of the working class. They will tremble...! < Bolshevik chorus swells >

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thumbnail looks like a really confused Canadian flag.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 2 months ago

so, a danish flag.