this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

Libraries

487 readers
157 users here now

For talk of all things related to libraries!

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh those sad, sorry publishers. It'll be so hard on them if they can't make as many billion dollars per year off publicly funded research. How will they ever survive on less than $19 billion?

FTA:

Although open-access advocates and library groups support the move, opponents argue the new policy will limit researchers’ ability to maintain control of their published work—and cut into the $19 billion academic publishing industry’s profit margins.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

opponents argue the new policy will limit researchers’ ability to maintain control of their published work

From what I understand, researchers already aren't able to maintain control of their published work because of the publishers.

[–] Uncle_Abbie@literature.cafe 9 points 2 months ago

Typically your work belongs to the person who pays you for it. So it seems to me that if it's paid for by the public, then it's owned by the public.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The whole article's worth reading.

Currently, the academic publishing industry’s business model relies largely on an author’s willingness to submit work for free—or even pay to publish it—and the publisher’s ability to turn around and sell that research to academic libraries through expensive journal subscriptions. Libraries at doctoral-granting institutions spend about 80 percent of their materials budgets on such subscriptions ...

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago

Sounds like an industry that doesn't deserve to exist.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Oh nooooooo. Anyways...