this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2022
24 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
34862 readers
26 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
@AgreeableLandscape
Pretty sure the software developers knew about this obvious issue but executives at the top we're, like, "Nope. Leave it as is."
they are gonna have you rip out and replace the entire board just to replace that flash chip I bet you
They can't even replace just that chip. It's soldered. The days of being able to take the storage out of a mainboard without destroying the rest of it are coming to a close.
I don't agree. It's almost certainly a BGA which means it is more difficult to desolder (I would use chip quik normally) but still can be done. See Louis Rossman's videos.
Reflowing a board is expensive and doesn't have a great success rate. You can pretty easily damage the rest of the board while trying to reflow a chip. Or damage the chip itself. As Louis Rossman has also shown and discussed in his videos.
But you what is dirt cheap and has almost a 100% success rate? Unplugging a storage card from the socket and replacing it.
I haven't reflowed before so I wouldn't know. I think you are suggesting an SD card instead of a eMMC. That can work and prob wouldn't be more expensive, but that's an SPI interface I think so slower than what might be an 8bit interface on the eMMC.
maybe more components should be socket'd......
I think you are suggesting an SD card instead of a eMMC.
Not really, maybe a socketed eMMC chip like you can find on single board computers?
Or, if we're being honest, why are we using eMMC on a car? It's not exactly a rock solid storage solution and does not inspire confidence when used on a vehicle of all things. Use an mSATA SSD or something, at least. Hell, even mSATA is on its way out in favour of NVME but it's still way better than eMMC. The freaking car is 50 grand or more and they're too cheap to even have a proper SSD?
I didn't know you can get that, so maybe I'll use it in a design....
Now under normal circumstances, this wouldn’t be an issue. There are literally billions of devices running Linux from an eMMC chip. But any competent embedded Linux developer would take the steps necessary to make sure the operating system’s various log files are not being written to a non-replaceable storage device soldered onto the board
Unfortunately, for reasons that still remain somewhat unclear, the build of Linux running on the MCU is doing exactly that. What’s worse, Tesla’s graphical interface appears to be generating its own additional log messages. Despite the likelihood that nobody will ever actually read them, for every second a Tesla is driving down the road, more lines are being added to the log files.
wow now reading this that's so f*cking stupid.
Or, if we’re being honest, why are we using eMMC on a car? It’s not exactly a rock solid storage solution and does not inspire confidence when used on a vehicle of all things. Use an mSATA SSD or something, at least. The freaking car is 50 grand or more and they’re too cheap to even have a proper SSD?
idk I wouldn't drive one of those things anyways. I just know where eMMCs can be useful.
Unfortunately, for reasons that still remain somewhat unclear, the build of Linux running on the MCU is doing exactly that. What’s worse, Tesla’s graphical interface appears to be generating its own additional log messages. Despite the likelihood that nobody will ever actually read them, for every second a Tesla is driving down the road, more lines are being added to the log files.
Doesn't this also mean that the eMMC will eventually run out of storage space? I remember when I did something which also generated a lot of log files on an SBC. After a few months of 24/7 operation there was so much stuff in /var/log that the 64GB eMMC was almost completely full.
Please don't tell me they set up a cron job or something to delete some log files every day/week/month so this wouldn't happen. Because that would mean that they are aware of the fact, that they're writing massive amounts of log files to flash memory over and over again.
Maybe it was some programmer who's good with code but doesn't bother to understand hardware.