this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
203 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5919 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Nobody can ever trust Fox News, and I am one of them, with the weak and ineffective RINO, Paul Ryan, on its Board of Directors. He’s a total lightweight, a failed and pathetic Speaker of the House, and a very disloyal person. Romney was bad, but Paul Ryan made him look worse. As a team, they never had a chance. Rupaul and Lachluster get that dog off your Board - You don’t need him. ALL YOU NEED IS TRUMP. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

-@RealDonaldTrump

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can’t tell if real or parody.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm going to say real, with no evidence. It's spiteful enough to pass the sniff test.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Doubt it. "RuPaul" and "Lachluster"are too clever to have emerged from the dishwater-soaked, infected sponge sitting on top of his spinal column where a real human would have a brain.

I love how Trump's ghostwriters try to calibrate to him, and they never are quite able to make themselves dumb enough.

[–] Hoomod@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's the talking in the third person that lets you know it's real

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Rust belt, sun belt, Bible belt... USA is so fat, it needs multiple belts!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

wikipedia lists 21 here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_belt_regions_of_the_United_States

but some of them are state regions. so they have tiny belts too.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Don't forget the jello belt.

[–] style99@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

Trump, meanwhile, takes the 1-point lead over Harris in North Carolina, with 48 percent support to her 47 percent.

It's progress, but there's still a ways to go.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

AZ Gallego 56%, Lake 41%

Though I like it, I can't believe it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Take a look at the Governor, AG, and Secretary of State. Arizona is blue. To the eternal dismay of the state legislature that's still got a gerrymandered GOP hangover.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. There's more to it, with those two in particular. Kari Lake made a giant ass of herself in the gubernatorial election a couple years ago and then made national headlines dragging it out, lying in hilarious ways the entire time. She was a TV anchor before trying to be governor. Ruben Gallegos is a combat veteran and time tested politician from Arizona's most populous county.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes. I know, but 15 points is quite a gap at this stage. IMO, it indicates there is a particular part of the electorate that dislike Lake and will vote against her. In other words, she pissed someone off (if that's a real number)

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's what I'm trying to tell you. She very much did. People did not like her election denialism. Katie Hobbs won the governor's seat in large part because she defended the voting system from Trump in 2020 and because Kari Lake was the local face of Trump's efforts to overturn the election. Now she has that anchor around her neck and her support of the 1864 abortion ban. She's pissed a lot of people off and I wouldn't be surprised if the more moderate Republicans just aren't going to vote at all.