this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
31 points (84.4% liked)

Movies

7492 readers
165 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just a reminder that this is a PVOD release, not streaming. PVOD (premium video-on-demand) is when you pay a one-time price to buy or rent the movie digitally on platforms like Amazon Prime, iTunes, Google Play, Vudu, etc. It will not be available to stream for free on Max or Starz.

Of course, it makes no difference to those who torrent since it'll be available on public trackers within the hour, but I'm just clearing things up for those who think it will stream for free on a subscription-based platform.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 7 points 3 months ago

If as many people care as went to see it, both will be glad of your information.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 2 months ago

I can't imagine even wasting the bandwidth on torrenting that steaming heap of turds.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago
[–] ByteOnBikes 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Ill put it on my list of things to watch AFTER Madam Web, a video of Spiders eating babies, videos of homeless people defecating in public, and a Donald Trump rally.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'm going to level with you. I watched Madam Web. It wasn't great and it had a lot of "wait what?" moments, but it still was glued together enough as a movie not to be miserable. I set my expectations center of the earth low, and was pleasantly surprised.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Madame Web has 2 things going for it: Sydney Sweeney

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Madame Web was the most fun I've had in theaters in YEARS.

They constantly try to tell you her superpower is foresight but I swear her superpower is being able to hit bad guys with cars she drove through a wall.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just watch the Madam Web Pitch Meeting: https://youtu.be/Kc0Tyfb_-UU

[–] abobla@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago
[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago

Cool, now I can continue having no interest whatsoever in watching it.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Could it be so bad that it's good ala Mario Bros?

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

As a watcher of so-bad-it's-good movies, I don't have high hopes. This movie looks like it will play straight down the middle of being competent enough while also not being weirdly creative in any way at all. That's a recipe for the most boring kind of movie.

The 90's Mario movie was terrible, but also absolutely bonkers, giving it some cult viewing value.

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

I've seen some others going in with that expectation, and the general consensus seems to be that its slow and extremely by-the-numbers, with nothing done badly enough to be funny or interesting. Its just bad in a boring way.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Nah it's just bad. A lot of generic tropes.

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

That movie deserved an award. Not a great award, but an award.

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nah, don't think so. Was in limbo for 3 years and they cut all the gore. Seems like a boring, competent made movie for no one.

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look at the top and you can see the crew man opening the hatch

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Alright alright I take it back. There is just no excuse for that.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

Competent? Not from the clips I've seen.

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe next time don’t release a movie based on a game that hasn’t had a new release in 5 years.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think that was less the problem compared to the movie, by all accounts and previews, simply not being any good. There are plenty of long dormant game properties that could be the foundation for good movies or TV.

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

True, I just think it would have had a much better chance to succeed being relevant. Look at the new Fallout 76 expansion and its success following the series. Granted that series was actually good.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago

Naw, that could have bombed if it was bad just like halo. Bad writing and casting was its issue 100%.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Relevancy couldn't elevate a movie that was assembled by studio committee, starring, written, directed, and produced by people who don't care one bit about the source material or even try to get what made it popular to begin with. And let's face it, not everything is adaptable to begin with. Nobody played Borderlands for its plot.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe next time don’t release a movie based on a game that hasn’t had a new release in 5 years.

Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands came out in 2022.

Also recency of release is not an indicator of quality. They could’ve done a good job had they even remotely tried to be true to the source material. We’re seeing great examples of this recently, with The Last of Us and Fallout. If you care about the source material and don’t go about making a generic appeals-to-everyone slop, then you can make something decent.